2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial of strategies to increase chlamydia screening in young women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple attendances without retesting were common, particularly among women. Computer alerts which prompt clinicians to consider an outstanding medical procedure when a patient attends for their next consultation are used in primary care for various purposes such as immunisation catch ups and pap smears and could be particularly effective for retesting reminders 32 33. Second, despite guidelines advising against retesting within 6 weeks of chlamydia treatment, a quarter of patients with a positive test were retested in this period, and the majority were not subsequently retested in the recommended retest periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple attendances without retesting were common, particularly among women. Computer alerts which prompt clinicians to consider an outstanding medical procedure when a patient attends for their next consultation are used in primary care for various purposes such as immunisation catch ups and pap smears and could be particularly effective for retesting reminders 32 33. Second, despite guidelines advising against retesting within 6 weeks of chlamydia treatment, a quarter of patients with a positive test were retested in this period, and the majority were not subsequently retested in the recommended retest periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several interventions that increase overall screening rates, using provider education, prompts, and incentives, as well as system-level changes. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Although the majority of those studies showed improved chlamydia screening rates for intervention groups, overall screening rates remained fairly low. Few if any studies have addressed differences in testing rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we do not know how screening rates would have changed had the laws not been enacted in Georgia and Tennessee. Nonetheless, the use of such policies may be more effective if used in combination with education and other structural interventions [26,28]. More studies need to be carried out using different sources of data to better assess the effectiveness (or the lack thereof) of the chlamydia screening coverage mandate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%