2015
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1504927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages

Abstract: BACKGROUNDProgesterone is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. However, whether progesterone supplementation in the first trimester of pregnancy would increase the rate of live births among women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages is uncertain. METHODSWe conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to investigate whether treatment with progesterone would increase the rates of live births and newborn survival among women with unexplained recurrent miscarri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
171
2
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
171
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 To alleviate the uncertainty, we reported a preliminary observation on the changes in AMH levels from 12 women before and up to 12 months after HIFU treatment, and this article was published in April 2016. 4 We are pleased to see that Lee et al's conclusion confirms our previous observation, despite our patients having received an overall higher treatment energy (median 575 521.5 joules). 4 However, it was commented that our study only included women over 40 years of age, and hence the AMH levels were generally low and might not be applicable to younger patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 To alleviate the uncertainty, we reported a preliminary observation on the changes in AMH levels from 12 women before and up to 12 months after HIFU treatment, and this article was published in April 2016. 4 We are pleased to see that Lee et al's conclusion confirms our previous observation, despite our patients having received an overall higher treatment energy (median 575 521.5 joules). 4 However, it was commented that our study only included women over 40 years of age, and hence the AMH levels were generally low and might not be applicable to younger patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…4 We are pleased to see that Lee et al's conclusion confirms our previous observation, despite our patients having received an overall higher treatment energy (median 575 521.5 joules). 4 However, it was commented that our study only included women over 40 years of age, and hence the AMH levels were generally low and might not be applicable to younger patients. In the study by Lee et al, the women's ages were between 24 and 45 years.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although natural and synthetic progestogens have been extensively used in pregnant patients or patients undergoing infertility treatments for various indications such as prevention of unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss and threatened abortion (34,35), it remained controversial whether P4 supplementation would increase the chance of successful implantation and ongoing pregnancy among women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages (35,36). Debate is still ongoing with regard to the best administration timing (luteal phase or first trimester of pregnancy) and method of P4 supplementation for better implantation rate and term pregnancy outcomes in these patients (36 Genomic deletions of the respective genes in Ishikawa cells employing the CRISPR/Cas9 system were performed as previously described (46).…”
Section: Animals and Treatments Bmi1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate is still ongoing with regard to the best administration timing (luteal phase or first trimester of pregnancy) and method of P4 supplementation for better implantation rate and term pregnancy outcomes in these patients (36 Genomic deletions of the respective genes in Ishikawa cells employing the CRISPR/Cas9 system were performed as previously described (46). The Cas9 and sgRNA plasmid pX458 were obtained from Addgene (plasmid number 48138).…”
Section: Animals and Treatments Bmi1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from a subsequent double-blind definitive trial [PROMISE trial, (Table 1)] conducted in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage, 6 and given vaginal suppositories of micronized progesterone (432 women), progesterone showed no benefit in increasing the rate of live birth after 24 weeks of gestation. Norman et al 7 conducted a large double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study [OPPTIMUM trial, (Table 1)] on pregnancy and infant outcomes in women at risk of preterm birth after being treated with vaginal progesterone taken daily from 22, 23, or 24 to 34 weeks of gestation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%