2020
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial of permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless persons with high use of publicly funded services

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
99
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of an HF intervention in four French cities among high-need participants similarly found no significant effects on hospitalization or ED visits, but reduced inpatient days [26]. Another a= Based on the DSM-IV criteria using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview [MINI] version 6.0, c=Absolute numbers less than six have been suppressed to reduce the risk of identification randomized study of the effects of permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless high users of multiple systems in Santa Clara County, California (USA) found no effects on ED or inpatient care use [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study of an HF intervention in four French cities among high-need participants similarly found no significant effects on hospitalization or ED visits, but reduced inpatient days [26]. Another a= Based on the DSM-IV criteria using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview [MINI] version 6.0, c=Absolute numbers less than six have been suppressed to reduce the risk of identification randomized study of the effects of permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless high users of multiple systems in Santa Clara County, California (USA) found no effects on ED or inpatient care use [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of an HF intervention in four French cities among high-need participants similarly found no significant effects on hospitalization or ED visits, but reduced inpatient days [ 26 ]. Another randomized study of the effects of permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless high users of multiple systems in Santa Clara County, California (USA) found no effects on ED or inpatient care use [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have been explained by police having an increased ability to serve outstanding warrants to people upon rehousing. 61 Given the high rates of substance use, expansion of substance use treatment programs might reduce older homeless adults’ risk of incarceration. Among all variables that we tested, parole and probation (community supervision) had the highest hazard ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding stands at odds with growing enthusiasm in the healthcare sector for such efforts (Gawande, 2011). RCTs for other healthcare organization‐led interventions, such as deployment of community health workers, hospital‐based ride‐share programs, and housing initiatives, have also been conducted in recent years (Chaiyachati et al., 2018; Raven, Niedzwiecki, & Kushel, 2020; Vasan et al., 2020).…”
Section: The Fundamental Value Of Rcts—examples From Health Policymentioning
confidence: 99%