Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial of Low-Protein Diet in Type 1 and in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Incipient and Overt Nephropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most evidence supports moderate restriction of protein intake, but follow-up has typically been short (29)(30)(31). The largest trial, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease trial, demonstrated no effect of protein restriction on renal function (32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most evidence supports moderate restriction of protein intake, but follow-up has typically been short (29)(30)(31). The largest trial, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease trial, demonstrated no effect of protein restriction on renal function (32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the contrary, similar benefits of a low-protein diet were not observed in 69 patients with either type 1 (n 5 32) or type 2 (n 5 37) diabetes and moderately to severely increased albuminuria on a lowprotein (0.6 g/kg/day) diet or a "free" (nonstandardized) protein diet for 12 months (116). Other studies and metaanalyses have also reported negative results (127,135). However, there are many limitations of the previous studies, including combining type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with varying stages of CKD, inconsistent concurrent management strategies (e.g., RAAS blockers), small sample sizes resulting in lack of statistical power, varying durations of intervention, lack of identification and uniformity of protein sources (e.g., plant versus animal) and other dietary components (fats, carbohydrates, phosphorus, and sodium), and incomplete assessment of dietary adherence.…”
Section: Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An increasing body of evidence suggests that dietary pattern intake rather than a sole focus on individual nutrients may offer a more practical approach to dietary management of chronic diseases (122-124). (126)(127)(128)(129)(130)(131)(132)(133).Theeffectsofalow-protein (daily intake of 0.6 g protein/kg ideal body weight), low-phosphorus (500-1,000 mg/day) diet were compared with those of a control diet containing $1.0 g protein/kg ideal body weight per day and $1,000 mg phosphorus per day in 35 patients with type 1 diabetes and DKD. Study participants on the lowprotein, low-phosphorus diet had a slower rate of decline in iothalamate GFR over the course of the study.…”
Section: Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33][34] A low-protein diet has not reduced the risk of mortality or ESRD compared with a usual protein diet, at least in the course of CKD stages 1-3. [35][36][37][38][39] Screening for patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1-3: facts and fallacies…”
Section: Methods Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%