A Randomized Trial of a DWI Intervention Program for First Offenders: Intervention Outcomes and Interactions With Antisocial Personality Disorder Among a Primarily American‐Indian Sample

Woodall, W. Gill; Delaney, Harold D.; Kunitz, Stephen J.; Westerberg, Verner S.; Zhao, Hongwei

doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00380.x

Cited by 69 publications

(106 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

100

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…76 In persons convicted for the first time of driving under the influence of alcohol, a treatment program that incorporated motivational interviewing added to detention led to less alcohol use 2 years after release from custody, compared with detention alone. 143 By contrast with these studies, motivational interviewing did not improve outcomes in 3 studies. 48,75,128,129 In another study of adolescents with past year substance use, there was no difference in alcohol use between those randomized to motivational interviewing or relaxation therapy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 64%

“…41,109,113 Substance Abuse Motivational interviewing during imprisonment-Eight studies assessed the impact of motivational interviewing, 48,75,76,115,116,[127][128][129][130][131]143 and of these, 5 produced a positive result. 76,115,116,127,130,131,143 In adolescents with recent substance use, motivational interviewing was effective compared with relaxation training in reducing alcohol and marijuana use 130,131 and driving under the influence of alcohol, 127 but it did not reduce the frequency of driving under the influence of marijuana or being a passenger with a driver under the influence or alcohol or marijuana. 127 Motivational interviewing reduced drug use compared with treatment as usual in women with alcohol and drug abuse histories.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions to Improve the Health of Persons During Imprisonment and in the Year After Release

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of people during imprisonment or in the year after release. We searched 14 biomedical and social science databases in 2014, and identified 95 studies.Most studies involved only men or a majority of men (70/83 studies in which gender was specified); only 16 studies focused on adolescents. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 57). The risk of bias for outcomes in almost all studies was unclear or high (n=91). In 59 studies, interventions led to improved mental health, substance use, infectious diseases, or health service utilization outcomes; in 42 of these studies, outcomes were measured in the community after release.Improving the health of people who experience imprisonment requires knowledge generation and knowledge translation, including implementation of effective interventions.Worldwide, more than 11 million people are imprisoned at any given time, and the prison population continues to grow at a rate faster than that of the general population. 1 Substantial evidence reveals that people who have experienced imprisonment have poor health compared with the general population, as indicated by the prevalence of mental illness, infectious diseases, chronic diseases, and mortality. 2 There are several reasons to focus on improving the health of people who experience imprisonment. 3 The burden of disease in this population affects the general population directly through increased health care costs and through the transmission of communicable diseases (e.g., HIV, HCV, and tuberculosis) after people are released from detention. Imprisonment has also been associated with worse health in family members of those who are detained, compared with the general population, including chronic diseases 4 and poor mental health 5,6 in adult relatives and mortality in male children. 7 At the community level, higher rates of incarceration have been associated with adverse health outcomes, such as sexually transmitted infections and teen pregnancies. 8 There is also evidence that poor health in persons who are released from detention, particularly those with inadequately treated mental illness and substance use disorders, 3 may affect public safety and reincarceration rates, 3 and that better access to health care is associated with less recidivism. 9,10 Finally, the right to health and health care is enshrined in international human rights documents, 11,12 and is a legislated responsibility of governments in many countries.Intervening during imprisonment and at the time of release could improve the health of people who experience imprisonment and public health overall. 13 To address this gap, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve health in persons during imprisonment and in the year after release.We chose this population because we view imprisonment as a unique opportunity to deliver and to link with interventions for this population, and to highlight interventions t...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 64%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions to Improve the Health of Persons During Imprisonment and in the Year After Release

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plusieurs études n'ont pas indiqué les éléments importants permettant de juger de la façon dont les auteurs ont réduit les biais méthodologiques potentiels. Plus de la moitié des études présentent des risques élevés de biais Chanut et al, 2007 ;Mello et al, 2005 ;Nirenberg et al, 2013 ;Stein et al, 2006 ;Woodall et al, 2007), trois études présentent des risques de biais moyens (Mello, Longabaugh, Baird, Nirenberg & Woolard, 2008 ;Ouimet et al, 2013 ;Schermer, Moyers, Miller & Bloomfield, 2006) et deux études présentent de faibles risques de biais (Brown et al, 2010 ;Utter et al, 2014). Les essais avec répartition aléatoire devraient rapporter les éléments importants liés à la méthode employée de manière à permettre aux lecteurs d'évaluer les biais méthodologiques, comme suggéré par le CONSORT Statement ).…”

Section: Discussion Caractéristiques Des éTudes Et Biais Méthodologiquesunclassified

“…Études sur les contrevenants primaires de la CCA Woodall, Delaney, Kunitz, Westerberg et Zhao (2007) ont examiné l'effet de l'EM+, associé à une peine de prison de 28 jours et à un programme incluant plusieurs autres éléments, sur la consommation d'alcool et la CCA chez plus de 300 contrevenants primaires. Environ 76 % des contrevenants étaient d'origine amérindienne et 17 % ont été diagnostiqués avec un trouble de la personnalité antisociale.…”

Section: Efficacité Des Interventionsunclassified

“…Les trois études sur les jeunes contrevenants Nirenberg et al, 2013 ;Stein et al, 2006) et les deux études sur les contrevenants primaires (Utter et al, 2014 ;Woodall et al, 2007) présentent des résultats mixtes et plusieurs biais méthodologiques. Ces études n'incluaient pas de critère de consommation problématique d'alcool.…”

Section: Preuves Scientifiques De L'efficacité Des Adaptations De L'eunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

L’efficacité de l’entretien motivationnel dans la prévention secondaire et tertiaire de la conduite avec les capacités affaiblies par l’alcool : une revue systématique de la documentation

Ouimet

Averill

Brown

2015

dss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La consommation d’alcool est liée à environ 30 % des collisions routières mortelles. Dans plusieurs juridictions, des programmes d’évaluation et de traitement de la consommation d’alcool chez les contrevenants sont mis en place afin de réduire leur consommation et leur récidive. De par sa forme brève, l’entretien motivationnel (EM) suscite l’intérêt du milieu clinique. Cette revue systématique de la documentation scientifique examine l’efficacité de l’EM dans la prévention secondaire et tertiaire de la conduite avec les capacités affaiblies par l’alcool (CCA) chez les contrevenants et chez les patients recrutés à la suite d’une collision routière, notamment chez les jeunes. La recherche de la documentation dans les banques de données CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO et PubMed a couvert la période de 1983 à 2014. Elle a permis d’identifier 11 essais contrôlés avec répartition aléatoire des participants dans les groupes expérimentaux ou témoins. Une évaluation des risques de biais a été effectuée à l’aide de la grille de la collaboration Cochrane. La disparité des résultats n’a pas permis le regroupement quantitatif des données. Bien que les études disponibles soient encore peu nombreuses (n = 6), les résultats sur l’efficacité de l’EM sont prometteurs chez les récidivistes et les patients recrutés en milieu hospitalier avec une consommation d’alcool problématique. De plus, quatre de ces études présentent des biais méthodologiques moyennement faibles ou faibles. Les résultats sont mixtes en ce qui a trait aux études (n = 5) portant sur les jeunes contrevenants et les contrevenants ayant commis une première infraction de CCA, sans consommation problématique d’alcool comme critère d’inclusion dans l’étude. Une seule de ces études présente des biais méthodologiques faibles. D’autres essais contrôlés avec répartition aléatoire, menés et rapportés selon les règles proposées par le Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement, sont donc nécessaires afin de démontrer l’efficacité de l’EM dans la prévention secondaire et tertiaire de la CCA chez les jeunes contrevenants et les contrevenants à leur première infraction de CCA. Ils permettraient aussi de corroborer les résultats préliminaires obtenus auprès de récidivistes et de patients recrutés en milieu hospitalier.Alcohol use is linked to approximately 30 % of all fatal traffic crashes. In many jurisdictions, evaluation and treatment programs for offenders are in place to reduce alcohol misuse and recidivism. Due to its brevity, Motivational Interviewing (MI) has captured the attention of the clinical community. This systematic review of the scientific literature examines the effectiveness of MI for secondary and tertiary prevention of driving while impaired by alcohol (DWI) in offenders and in drivers recruited from hospital settings following a traffic crash – with a specific focus directed at young drivers. Search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and PubMed databases covering the 1983−2014 period identified 11 studies that described randomization to experiment...

show abstract

Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults

Foxcroft

Coombes

Wood

et al. 2014

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The results of this review indicate that there are no substantive, meaningful benefits of MI interventions for the prevention of alcohol misuse. Although some significant effects were found, we interpret the effect sizes as being too small, given the measurement scales used in the studies included in the review, to be of relevance to policy or practice. Moreover, the statistically significant effects are not consistent for all misuse measures, heterogeneity was a problem in some analyses and bias cannot be discounted as a potential cause of these findings.

show abstract

A Randomized Trial of a DWI Intervention Program for First Offenders: Intervention Outcomes and Interactions With Antisocial Personality Disorder Among a Primarily American‐Indian Sample

Abstract: Nonconfrontational treatment may significantly enhance outcomes for DWI offenders with ASPD when delivered in an incarcerated setting, and in the present study, such effects were found in a primarily American-Indian sample.

Cited by 69 publications

References 44 publications

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions to Improve the Health of Persons During Imprisonment and in the Year After Release

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions to Improve the Health of Persons During Imprisonment and in the Year After Release

L’efficacité de l’entretien motivationnel dans la prévention secondaire et tertiaire de la conduite avec les capacités affaiblies par l’alcool : une revue systématique de la documentation

Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About