A Randomized Trial Comparing Dual Axis Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in a Population with a High Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the leading cause of graft failure in pediatric heart transplant recipients, also adding to mortality in this patient population. Coronary angiography is routinely performed to screen for CAV, with conventional single-plane or bi-plane angiography being utilized. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA) has been described, mostly in the adult population, and may offer reduction in radiation dose and contrast volume. Experience with this in the pediatric population is limited. This study describes a single-institution experience with RA for screening for CAV in pediatric patients. The catheterization database at our institution was used to identify pediatric heart transplant recipients having undergone RA to screen for CAV. Procedural data including radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure time were collected for each catheterization. The number of instances in which RA was not successful, ECG changes were present, and CAV was detected were also collected for each catheterization. A total of 97 patients underwent 345 catheterizations utilizing RA. Median radiation dose-area product per kilogram was found to be 341.7 (mGy cm(2)/kg), total air kerma was 126.8 (mGy), procedure time was 69 min, fluoroscopy time was 9.9 min, and contrast volume was 13 ml. A total of 17 (2 %) coronary artery injections out of 690 could not be successfully imaged using RA. A total of 14 patients had CAV noted at any point, 10 of whom had progressive CAV. Electrocardiographic changes were documented in a total of 10 (3 %) RA catheterizations. Procedural characteristics did not differ between serial catheterizations. RA is safe and feasible for CAV screening in pediatric heart transplant recipients while offering coronary imaging in multiple planes compared to conventional angiography.

show abstract

Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Rios

Loomba

Foerster

et al. 2016

Pediatr Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and advanced chronic kidney disease on chronic hemodialysis versus off hemodialysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is more frequently observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in patients without CKD. Initial treatment strategy for AMI includes primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which requires substantial amount of contrast media. We hypothesized that the clinical outcomes are comparable or worse in patients with AMI and advanced CKD off chronic hemodialysis as compared to patients with AMI and advanced CKD on chronic hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and advanced CKD on hemodialysis versus off hemodialysis. A total of 148 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m on admission were included and were divided into the HD group (n = 68) and non-HD group (n = 80). The length of hospitalization was significantly less in the HD group (15.7 ± 14.8 days) than in the non-HD group (22.4 ± 21.3 days) (P = 0.01). In-hospital death was significantly less in the HD group (10.3%) than in the non-HD group (25.0%) (P = 0.02). While the non-HD group was not significantly associated with in-hospital death after controlling clinical covariates, the non-HD group (odd ratio 2.89, 95% confidence interval 1.03-8.12, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with long hospitalization even after controlling clinical covariates. In conclusion, as compared to advanced CKD on chronic hemodialysis, advanced CKD off hemodialysis had higher morbidity and mortality in patients with AMI. Advanced CKD off hemodialysis was closely associated with long hospitalization even after controlling clinical factors.

show abstract

Usefulness of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several studies have shown that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) reduces contrast medium volume and radiation exposure compared to conventional coronary angiography (CCA). However, there are no studies comparing the safety and usefulness of DARCA in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DARCA on contrast medium volume, radiation exposure, time course of treatment, and adverse events in primary PCI for patients with STEMI. A total of 82 patients undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. Subjects were propensity matched to 41 patients in the CCA group and 41 in the DARCA group. Data were retrospectively collected from in-patient medical records and the contrast medium volume and radiation exposure (dose-area product, DAP) during the PCI procedure was compared between the two groups. Contrast medium volume [100.0 (82.5–115.0) vs 110 (102.5–127.5) ml, p = 0.018, r = 0.26] and DAP [113.4 (74.3–141.1) vs 138.1 (100.5–194.7) Gy cm2, p = 0.014, r = 0.27] were significantly lower in the DARCA group, compared with the CCA group. Door to device time (68.7 ± 26.1 vs 76.5 ± 44.2 min, p = 0.33) were comparable between the two groups. There were no adverse events requiring treatment reported in either groups. DARCA may reduce contrast medium volume and radiation exposure in primary PCI for patients with STEMI, and can be used safely, without delaying reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Dual Axis Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in a Population with a High Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract: In a population with a high prevalence of CAD, DARCA was safe and resulted in a significant decrease in contrast volume and radiation dose.

Cited by 9 publications

References 19 publications

Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Dual-Axis Rotational Angiography is Safe and Feasible to Detect Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

The comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and advanced chronic kidney disease on chronic hemodialysis versus off hemodialysis

Usefulness of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About