2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized sham controlled comparison of once vs twice-daily intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression: A Canadian rTMS treatment and biomarker network in depression (CARTBIND) study

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, although most of the TMS clinical studies have used once-daily sessions of rTMS, we proposed to deliver sessions twice-daily in line with our previous studies in schizophrenia ( Brunelin et al., 2022 , Poulet et al., 2005 ). Some studies in depression have directly compared once- to twice-daily protocols while matching the same total number of pulses and showed nonsignificant differences in final response or remission rates between conditions ( Blumberger et al., 2021 ; Schulze et al., 2018 ), however, clinical improvement was faster ( Schulze et al., 2018 ) and tends to be stronger ( Modirrousta et al., 2018 ) with twice-daily sessions. Repeating sessions twice daily, which can be considered an 'accelerated' protocol of rTMS ( Caulfield et al., 2022 ), is relevant to clinical practice because it reduces the number of days patients need to visit the clinical unit and thus can potentially increase adherence to treatment in certain clinical populations such as patients with schizophrenia ( Brunelin et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although most of the TMS clinical studies have used once-daily sessions of rTMS, we proposed to deliver sessions twice-daily in line with our previous studies in schizophrenia ( Brunelin et al., 2022 , Poulet et al., 2005 ). Some studies in depression have directly compared once- to twice-daily protocols while matching the same total number of pulses and showed nonsignificant differences in final response or remission rates between conditions ( Blumberger et al., 2021 ; Schulze et al., 2018 ), however, clinical improvement was faster ( Schulze et al., 2018 ) and tends to be stronger ( Modirrousta et al., 2018 ) with twice-daily sessions. Repeating sessions twice daily, which can be considered an 'accelerated' protocol of rTMS ( Caulfield et al., 2022 ), is relevant to clinical practice because it reduces the number of days patients need to visit the clinical unit and thus can potentially increase adherence to treatment in certain clinical populations such as patients with schizophrenia ( Brunelin et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with interest recent articles in Brain Stimulation, reporting on the antidepressant effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) applied in accelerated schedules [1,2] and the efficacy comparison between unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approaches [3]. We recently reported a multisite randomized controlled trial comparing the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated bilateral TBS applied at 80% or 120% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) and left-sided 10 Hz rTMS applied at 120% RMT [4].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16, № 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54101/ACEN.2022.3.9 с имитацией стимуляции [90][91][92][93] или стандартной ТМС [94]. Среди исследований с негативным результатом следует отметить работу P.B.…”
Section: технологии метапластичность и неинвазивная стимуляция мозгаunclassified