2018
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1328359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Sequential Procedure to Determine the Number of Factors

Abstract: This paper proposes a procedure to estimate the number of common factors k in a static approximate factor model. The building block of the analysis is the fact that the first k eigenvalues of the covariance matrix of the data diverge, whilst the others stay bounded. On the grounds of this, we propose a test for the null that the i -th eigenvalue diverges, using a randomised test statistic based directly on the estimated eigenvalue. The test only requires minimal assumptions on the data, and no assumptions are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 years. Analysis of the whole dataset using rolling samples of size m suggests between one and two factors throughout -this result consistently follows using different procedures -namely, Trapani (2017) testing procedure and the criteria by Bai and Ng (2002) and Alessi et al (2010). Therefore, we run our sequential testing pro- 515 520 525 548 2 505 522 530 537 574 506 523 531 538 576 3 513 532 541 550 598 514 534 542 552 598 4 519 546 557 569 648 520 548 560 574 669 175 1 501 515 520 525 546 502 516 521 526 552 2 507 524 531 537 564 507 524 532 539 572 3 508 532 541 550 578 508 534 542 552 579 4 518 543 552 562 598 518 544 555 565 599 250 1 502 514 520 527 552 502 514 521 527 553 2 508 524 531 540 571 508 525 532 541 571 3 510 533 542 551 590 510 534 543 552 589 4 515 542 552 562 600 515 544 553 564 603 cedure monitoring the first four factors, thus accounting both for at most two new factors emerging and for a change in...…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5 years. Analysis of the whole dataset using rolling samples of size m suggests between one and two factors throughout -this result consistently follows using different procedures -namely, Trapani (2017) testing procedure and the criteria by Bai and Ng (2002) and Alessi et al (2010). Therefore, we run our sequential testing pro- 515 520 525 548 2 505 522 530 537 574 506 523 531 538 576 3 513 532 541 550 598 514 534 542 552 598 4 519 546 557 569 648 520 548 560 574 669 175 1 501 515 520 525 546 502 516 521 526 552 2 507 524 531 537 564 507 524 532 539 572 3 508 532 541 550 578 508 534 542 552 579 4 518 543 552 562 598 518 544 555 565 599 250 1 502 514 520 527 552 502 514 521 527 553 2 508 524 531 540 571 508 525 532 541 571 3 510 533 542 551 590 510 534 543 552 589 4 515 542 552 562 600 515 544 553 564 603 cedure monitoring the first four factors, thus accounting both for at most two new factors emerging and for a change in...…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Proof of Lemma 1. The proof is similar to that of Lemma 1 in Trapani (2017), and therefore only the main arguments are reported. Recall the definition…”
Section: A2 Proofs Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations