1998
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199812270-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Prospective Controlled Trial of Oral Acyclovir Versus Oral Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients1

Abstract: Oral acyclovir provides effective CMV prophylaxis only for recipients of seronegative donor kidneys. Oral ganciclovir is a superior agent providing effective CMV prophylaxis for recipients of seropositive donor kidneys. Recipients who are treated for acute rejection are at risk for delayed CMV infection during the first posttransplantation year.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] Valganciclovir with its favorable pharmacokinetic profile was developed to overcome the limitations of ganciclovir. A single once-daily 900-mg oral dose of valganciclovir provides comparable plasma exposures to those achieved with 5 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir.…”
Section: Successful Cost-effective Prevention Of Cytomegalovirusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Valganciclovir with its favorable pharmacokinetic profile was developed to overcome the limitations of ganciclovir. A single once-daily 900-mg oral dose of valganciclovir provides comparable plasma exposures to those achieved with 5 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir.…”
Section: Successful Cost-effective Prevention Of Cytomegalovirusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 7.5%of patients contracted symptomatic CMV infection during the first year by treating patients with prophylactic acyclovir following renal transplantation, compared to 28% in two placebo groups [11]. Acyclovir has largely been supplemented by ganciclovir [12] and by valganciclovir in high-risk kidney transplant recipients [13]. Recent reports, however, have begun to illustrate the emergence of cytomegalovirus resistance in patients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The effectiveness of oral acyclovir has been studied in many trials; however, it has been shown that the effectiveness is not adequate for donor seropositive/recipient seronegative patients. 14,15 Valacyclovir is a newly introduced agent to reduce CMV infections and rejections. Valacyclovir prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the incidence of CMV disease from 22% to 2%.…”
Section: Umit Kervan Et Al/experimental and Clinical Transplantation mentioning
confidence: 99%