2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared with Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disease-free survival rate (87.1% vs. 63.9%, P = 0.05) and local tumor-free survival rate (100% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.014) in the NCRT group were better than those in the NCT group. No grade V reaction or perioperative death occurred in either group [ 20 ]. This research laid a methodological foundation and provided data to calculate the sample size in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disease-free survival rate (87.1% vs. 63.9%, P = 0.05) and local tumor-free survival rate (100% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.014) in the NCRT group were better than those in the NCT group. No grade V reaction or perioperative death occurred in either group [ 20 ]. This research laid a methodological foundation and provided data to calculate the sample size in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective is to determine the pCR rate in this trial. According to the results of the prospective phase II trial previously conducted at our center [ 20 ], the pCR rate of patients who received NCT was 14% (P0). We assume that after NCRT and six cycles of NCCT, the pCR rate will reach 28% in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the RESOLVE study [ 85 ], EGJ cancer patients comprised 36.5% of the study population, suggesting that perioperative chemotherapy could also be an effective treatment in the Asian population. For adenocarcinomas of the EGJ or squamous cell carcinoma in the middle to lower esophagus, clinical research supports neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy to effectively achieve tumor downstaging, improve R0 resection rate and prolong OS, without increasing postoperative complications or mortality rates [ 117 , 118 ], and it is considered the standard treatment. Long‐term follow‐up results from the German POET study [ 119 ], which involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (Siewert I‐III), suggest a tendency towards reduced recurrence and prolonged survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, with no significant increase in treatment toxicity or perioperative complications.…”
Section: Comprehensive Treatment Of Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%