2011
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiotherapy compared with bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiotherapy for intermediate-stage and T4N0-1 head and neck cancers

Abstract: Locoregional progression seen in T4N0-1 tumors treated with BFHX was unexpected and led to study termination. The addition of bevacuzimab to chemoradiotherapy for HNSCC should be limited clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two thirds of their study population had received prior irradiation. A subsequent phase II study comparing FHX versus FHX plus bevacizumab in stage II-III and select patients with T4N0-1 HNC had 3 patients (16%) in the experimental arm requiring multiple surgeries for poor wound healing (26). Whether these rates would be lower in the setting of conventional once daily RT or with different concurrent chemotherapy agents is unknown and warrants further investigation in the context of clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two thirds of their study population had received prior irradiation. A subsequent phase II study comparing FHX versus FHX plus bevacizumab in stage II-III and select patients with T4N0-1 HNC had 3 patients (16%) in the experimental arm requiring multiple surgeries for poor wound healing (26). Whether these rates would be lower in the setting of conventional once daily RT or with different concurrent chemotherapy agents is unknown and warrants further investigation in the context of clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of single-agent bevacizumab to CRT in patients with treatment-na€ ve nonmetastatic HNC was examined by Salama and colleagues as described earlier (26). The study was terminated early after 26 patients, due to unexpected locoregional progression in 4 of 5 T4N0-1 patients treated with bevacizumab and FHX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However 11.6% and 9.3% patients with fistula and ulceration/tissue necrosis respectively underline the concern about the side effects of the treatment [22]. Moreover these favourable outcomes were not confirmed by the phase II trial [23].…”
Section: Seiwert Et Al Reported Enthusiastic Results Of the Combinatmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Results of a follow-up phase II randomized study by the same group have been reported by Salama et al in which the BFHX regimen was compared to the prior FHX regimen (Salama et al, 2011). In this study, 26 patients with intermediate stage III-IV patients (excluding N2-N3 stage) were enrolled.…”
Section: Bevacizumab and Chemoradiotherapymentioning
confidence: 82%