2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01651-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized in vitro evaluation of transient and permanent cardiac implantable electronic device malfunctions following direct exposure up to 10 Gy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a direct effect of radiation on CIED hardware integrity is a possibility. 10 The combination of any or all of these effects will result in the clinically observed impact on CIED parameters following irradiation. In this patient it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the mechanism of the observed increase in stimulation threshold; however, the time-course suggests an effect prior to when myocardial fibrosis occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a direct effect of radiation on CIED hardware integrity is a possibility. 10 The combination of any or all of these effects will result in the clinically observed impact on CIED parameters following irradiation. In this patient it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the mechanism of the observed increase in stimulation threshold; however, the time-course suggests an effect prior to when myocardial fibrosis occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the failure criterion was met at a cumulative dose of 10 Gy, and the battery impedance increased about 1.8 times the initial value, indicating battery depletion ( Figure 2 ). In a previous study with WFF beams at a cumulative dose of 10 Gy, an ICP that had sufficient battery capacity before the start of the experiment had an unexpected battery drainage [ 22 ]. In our study, battery depletion might have occurred by setting the pacing-output as high, giving priority to the observation of the pacing-output voltage with an oscilloscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These malfunctions appear to be related to device cumulative radiation dose, and interactions of secondary neutrons with the device particularly at photon energies ≥10 MV and electron energies of ≥ 20MeV. However, CIED malfunctions as a result of electromagnetic interference (EMI) have also been previously reported during photon-EBRT ( 13 ). The influence of EMI generated by linear accelerators vary in different modalities ( 14 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the passive scattering (PS) mode, a larger number of neutrons are inevitably scattered both inside the treatment room and within the patient body (due to a greater number of beam modifiers) increasing the risk of secondary malignancies ( 48 , 49 ). In the pencil beam scanning (PBS) mode, neutron production is substantially reduced outside the patient’s body, yet a considerable number of neutrons are still generated within the patient body ( 13 , 50 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%