1988
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-198808000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (Leuprolide) with or without Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in the Treatment of Leiomyomata Uteri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, regression of uterine leiomyomata has been induced by treatment with the antiprogesterone drug RU 486, accompanied by reduction in the progesterone receptor (PR) but not the ER in the tumors, suggesting that the regression was attained through a direct antiprogesterone effect (Murphy et al 1993). In addition patients treated with leuprolide (a GnRH agonist capable of reducing the size of fibroids) who were concomitantly given medroxyprogesterone acetate demonstrated no significant reduction in myoma or uterine volume (Carr et al 1993;Friedman et al 1988). Indeed, clinical and laboratory evidence to date would appear to indicate that estrogen and progesterone may both be important as promoters of myoma growth (Rein 2000).…”
Section: Clinical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, regression of uterine leiomyomata has been induced by treatment with the antiprogesterone drug RU 486, accompanied by reduction in the progesterone receptor (PR) but not the ER in the tumors, suggesting that the regression was attained through a direct antiprogesterone effect (Murphy et al 1993). In addition patients treated with leuprolide (a GnRH agonist capable of reducing the size of fibroids) who were concomitantly given medroxyprogesterone acetate demonstrated no significant reduction in myoma or uterine volume (Carr et al 1993;Friedman et al 1988). Indeed, clinical and laboratory evidence to date would appear to indicate that estrogen and progesterone may both be important as promoters of myoma growth (Rein 2000).…”
Section: Clinical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though an insufficient dosage of nafarelin with hormone add-back therapy may explain that total failure of leiomyoma shrinkage in our patients, it appears that hormone add-back with oestrogen and progestin may also be unfavourable as regards leiomyomal shrinkage. Previously, medroxy-progesterone acetate simultaneously with GnRHa has been observed to block leiomyomal shrinkage [10]. Further, we have earlier reported that in postmenopausal leiomyomas, oestrogen replacement therapy alone increased cell proliferation less than did hormone substitution therapy with simultaneous oestrogen and progestin [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Simultaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate with GnRHa has been observed to reduce side effects but also to block the expected leiomyomal decrease in size [10]. However, GnRHa treatment followed by replacement therapy with oestrogen and progestin brought about a decrease in hypo-oestrogenic symptoms and also in most cases brought about leiomyomal shrinkage [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progestins alone have been employed to suppress vasomotor symptoms and bone mineral density loss in both patient groups. In leiomyoma patients, MPA when combined with leuprolide acetate eliminated vasomotor symptoms induced by GnRH-a but unfortunately neutralized the suppressive effect of the agonist on the reduction of tumor size [7,8]. A similar undesired effect was noted in endometriosis patients whose pain appeared to worsen and disease failed to resolve during combination therapy using MPA in daily doses of 20-30 mg [9].…”
Section: Role Of Add-back Therapy In Gynecologymentioning
confidence: 99%