1980
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(80)90010-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, double-blind study of two combined oral contraceptives containing the same progestogen, but different estrogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethinyl estradiol carries a notable pro‐coagulant and thrombotic risk 20–22 . When used in the context of contraception, these risks are offset by the well‐studied and desired improvement on menstrual cycle control 23 ; however, in the context of gender‐affirming treatment for transfeminine patients assigned male at birth, this benefit is not applicable, assumption of the thromboembolic risks is not warranted, and ethinyl estradiol is avoided. Similarly, conjugated equine estrogens can be difficult to monitor with conventional serologic laboratory testing, and given their association with increased thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risks and inherent challenges with therapeutic titration, are typically avoided in the context of feminizing GAHT 24,25 .…”
Section: Gender‐affirming Hormone Therapy—overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethinyl estradiol carries a notable pro‐coagulant and thrombotic risk 20–22 . When used in the context of contraception, these risks are offset by the well‐studied and desired improvement on menstrual cycle control 23 ; however, in the context of gender‐affirming treatment for transfeminine patients assigned male at birth, this benefit is not applicable, assumption of the thromboembolic risks is not warranted, and ethinyl estradiol is avoided. Similarly, conjugated equine estrogens can be difficult to monitor with conventional serologic laboratory testing, and given their association with increased thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risks and inherent challenges with therapeutic titration, are typically avoided in the context of feminizing GAHT 24,25 .…”
Section: Gender‐affirming Hormone Therapy—overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%