2000
DOI: 10.1080/09652140050111096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical evaluation of a nicotine sublingual tablet in smoking cessation

Abstract: The nicotine sublingual tablet increased the smoking cessation rate compared to placebo, reduced craving in highly dependent smokers and was well tolerated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons given by unsuccessful patients for not persisting with NRT (3 complained they were tired of chewing gum, and 5 claimed the gum was not effective) suggest that further improvements may be made by, for example, offering other nicotine replacement products such as an inhaler [16, 17]or a sublingual tablet [18]instead of chewing gum. And a combination of fixed-dose (nicotine patch) plus self-administered NRT (inhaler, gum, nasal spray or sublingual tablet) may benefit some smokers who have already tried single NRT [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons given by unsuccessful patients for not persisting with NRT (3 complained they were tired of chewing gum, and 5 claimed the gum was not effective) suggest that further improvements may be made by, for example, offering other nicotine replacement products such as an inhaler [16, 17]or a sublingual tablet [18]instead of chewing gum. And a combination of fixed-dose (nicotine patch) plus self-administered NRT (inhaler, gum, nasal spray or sublingual tablet) may benefit some smokers who have already tried single NRT [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetics of the 2-mg sublingual tablet are very similar to those of the 2-mg gum (i.e. similar nicotine concentrations are achieved with both formulations) [35]. In one clinical trial, highly dependent smokers (FTQ 5 7) were randomized to receive two tablets/hour, and the low dependent smokers (FTQ 5 7) were randomized to receive one tablet/hour.…”
Section: Nicotine Sublingual Tabletmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Complete abstinence rates were 50% vs. 29% at 6 weeks (p 5 0.001), 42% vs. 23% at 3 months (p 5 0.001) and 33% vs. 18% at 6 months (p 5 0.005). When analyzed with respect to level of baseline nicotine dependence, the tablet was more efficacious for highly dependent smokers [35]. The major side effects of the nicotine tablet included mouth irritation, hiccups and dyspepsia.…”
Section: Nicotine Sublingual Tabletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both low-and high-dependency smokers, treatment with the lozenge showed lower craving within the first 2 weeks of craving when it is at the peak [93,94]. These results starkly contrast with that for the sublingual tablet which only reduced craving and withdrawal in high or moderately dependent smokers [95,96]. In the highly dependent smokers, the 4-mg lozenge was particularly robust in suppressing withdrawal symptoms and craving even in the second week of abstinence, producing high quit rates, reducing weight gain, and showed a significant difference between placebo groups and active-treated groups [93,94].…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 72%