2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing two doses of erlotinib for second-line treatment of current smokers with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CurrentS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma levels of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 quantified by LC-MS/MS were within the range reported by other studies ( 6 , 12 ). While the erlotinib concentrations were found higher in the E300 treated patients in a previous phase III randomized NSCLC study ( 12 ), erlotinib concentrations measured in plasma by LC-MS/MS in this study were impressively similar between the E300 smoker group (average erlotinib concentration of 2500.8 ng/mL) and the E150 non-smoker group (average erlotinib concentration of 2503.8 ng/mL). This finding, in concordance with similar tumor response rates as measured by CT imaging, supports the concept of dosing erlotinib according to smoking status in the management of patients with HNSCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plasma levels of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 quantified by LC-MS/MS were within the range reported by other studies ( 6 , 12 ). While the erlotinib concentrations were found higher in the E300 treated patients in a previous phase III randomized NSCLC study ( 12 ), erlotinib concentrations measured in plasma by LC-MS/MS in this study were impressively similar between the E300 smoker group (average erlotinib concentration of 2500.8 ng/mL) and the E150 non-smoker group (average erlotinib concentration of 2503.8 ng/mL). This finding, in concordance with similar tumor response rates as measured by CT imaging, supports the concept of dosing erlotinib according to smoking status in the management of patients with HNSCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A study that administered erlotinib to healthy volunteers found that the geometric mean of the area under the curve (0-infinity) for the 150 mg dose was 2.8-fold lower among smokers than in non-smokers and similar to non-smokers who received the 300 mg dose ( 11 ). A follow-up phase III study of current smokers with NSCLC confirmed that higher dosing of erlotinib (300 mg daily, elected based on prior pharmacokinetic data ( 11 )) achieved higher plasma concentrations than standard dosing (150 mg daily) but did not yield a significant difference in clinical outcomes ( 12 ). In addition to increased drug clearance, there may also be a direct effect of nicotine contributing to erlotinib resistance ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, Roberts and his colleagues also discussed coping strategies in advanced cancer, focusing on either a ‘problem-focused’ or ‘emotion-focused’ therapy 14. In contrast, much has been written about the novel cancer therapeutics themselves 15–17. During the last couple of years, new mutations have been recovered in patients with lung cancer (EGFR), breast cancer (BRCA1, BRCA2 and HER2) and several other cancers, resulting in the development of new genotype-directed therapy throughout the patient’s disease course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found 2⋅2-fold higher mean plasma concentrations in the 300 mg QD compared to the 150 mg QD group. However, no progression free survival (PFS) improvement was observed in the higher dosed patients [12]. Mita et al investigated dose escalation in patients who initially received 150 mg QD, increasing the dose up to a level of tolerable skin toxicity.…”
Section: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc)mentioning
confidence: 99%