2016
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Compression Rates during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with 120 compressions per minute (CPM) to CPR with 100 CPM in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We randomly assigned patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest into two groups upon arrival to the emergency department (ED). The patients received manual CPR either with 100 CPM (CPR-100 group) or 120 CPM (CPR-120 group). The primary outcome measure was sustained restoration of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by bystander and/or EMS personnel may confound the results of our study because randomization and intervention were made at the emergency department (ED) instead of at initiation of resuscitation effort at the pre-hospital phase. In our study, most subjects (93.4% of the CPR-100 group and 92.9% of the CPR-120 group) received EMS CPR ( 1 ). During the study period, the subjects received manual CPR according to the 2010 CPR guidelines, which recommended compression rate of at least 100 CPM but not exceeding 120 CPM ( 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by bystander and/or EMS personnel may confound the results of our study because randomization and intervention were made at the emergency department (ED) instead of at initiation of resuscitation effort at the pre-hospital phase. In our study, most subjects (93.4% of the CPR-100 group and 92.9% of the CPR-120 group) received EMS CPR ( 1 ). During the study period, the subjects received manual CPR according to the 2010 CPR guidelines, which recommended compression rate of at least 100 CPM but not exceeding 120 CPM ( 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In addition to the 14 studies identified in the 2015 CoSTR for BLS, 3 , 4 an additional 8 studies 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 were identified, so a total of 22 studies were included in this ScopRev, which has been published in full. 122 Five observational studies examined both chest compression rate and chest compression depth.…”
Section: Components Of High-quality Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 122 Five observational studies examined both chest compression rate and chest compression depth. 127 , 128 , 129b , 130 , 131 One RCT, 124 1 crossover trial, 132 and 6 observational studies 125 , 129 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 examined chest compression rate only. One RCT 137 and 6 observational studies examined chest compression depth only, 67 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 and 2 observational studies examined chest wall recoil.…”
Section: Components Of High-quality Cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have read the report by Hwang et al ( 1 ) with great interest. Although there were no significant differences between the outcomes of 100/min chest compression rate (CCR) group and 120/min CCR group, it was worthy of notice that the one-month survival rate of 100/min CCR group was almost twice compared to the 120/min CCR group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%