2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of social cognition and interaction training for persons with first episode psychosis in Hong Kong

Abstract: Social cognitive impairment is a core limiting factor of functional recovery among persons with first episode psychosis (FEP). Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) is a group-based, manualized training with demonstrated evidence in improving social cognitive performance among people with schizophrenia. However, there are few studies on the effect of SCIT for people with FEP and for people in non-Western societies. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A handful of additional RCTs of SCIT for SSD have been published more recently. While several of these provide strong data in support of SCIT [e.g., (23)], a number of reports are less compelling with conclusions about efficacy based on within-group and not between group differences (24), analyses that only included those who completed a certain proportion of training sessions (25), small sample sizes with significant drop-out (17) and small to large effects that did not reach statistical significance (21). Some investigators have also reported failure to find significant group differences on any measures (26-28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of additional RCTs of SCIT for SSD have been published more recently. While several of these provide strong data in support of SCIT [e.g., (23)], a number of reports are less compelling with conclusions about efficacy based on within-group and not between group differences (24), analyses that only included those who completed a certain proportion of training sessions (25), small sample sizes with significant drop-out (17) and small to large effects that did not reach statistical significance (21). Some investigators have also reported failure to find significant group differences on any measures (26-28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%