A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of a Cognitive‐Behavioural Anger Management Group for Clients with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Background Fourteen clients with learning disabilities referred for anger management were randomly assigned to a treatment group and a waiting‐list control group. Methods Treatment consisted of nine 2‐h group sessions, using brainstorming, role‐play and homework. Topics addressed included: the triggers that evoke anger; physiological and behavioural components of anger; behavioural and cognitive strategies to avoid the build‐up of anger and for coping with anger‐provoking situations; and acceptable ways of displaying anger (assertiveness). The intervention was evaluated using two inventories of anger‐provoking situations, which were completed independently by both clients and carers. Results Clients in the treated group improved, on both self‐ and carer‐ratings, relative to their own pre‐treatment scores, and to the control group post‐treatment. The within‐group improvement corresponds to a ‘moderate’ (0.68 SD) effect size, whereas the between‐group improvement corresponds to a ‘large’ (1.76 SD) effect size. The degree of improvement during treatment was strongly correlated with Verbal IQ. Clients in the treated group showed further improvement relative to their own pre‐treatment scores at 3‐month follow‐up. Conclusions The treatment was effective in decreasing anger, in this randomized controlled trial of routine clinical practice.

Psychological therapies for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…These clinical referrals may be associated with the relatively small sample sizes found in most studies, ranging from as little as 14 (Willner, Jones, Tams, & Green, 2002) to 162 (Willner et al, 2013). (2006) delivered either an integrated bereavement intervention or traditional counselling to bereaved adults with IDs.…”

Can a computerised training paradigm assist people with intellectual disabilities to learn cognitive mediation skills? A randomised experiment

“…However, while there is evidence that an understanding of the A-B-C model is associated with outcome from CBT (Safran et al, 1993), we still do not know whether this is also the case for people with IDs. Furthermore, various studies have shown strong links between verbal ability, and both readiness for CBT (Dagnan et al, 2000;Dagnan & Chadwick, 1997;Joyce et al, 2006;Reed & Clements, 1989;Sams, Collins, & Reynolds, 2006), as well as therapeutic gains (Willner, Jones, Tams, & Green, 2002). The currently available assessments and training methods (Dagnan et al, 2000;Joyce et al, 2006;Reed & Clements, 1989) rely heavily on verbal comprehension and may be too difficult for some people with moderate IDs.…”

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

“…2. Only two studies 39,42 used randomised allocation to groups, and one of these 39 was extremely small. 3.…”

“…Positive results were reported for two interventionscognitive reappraisal and problem-solving -but few further details are available. participants 39,41,42 (although this has been disputed), 49 and in participants who are accompanied to the group by a carer. 39,41 There is evidence that 'paraprofessionals', working under supervision following minimal training, can deliver effective manualised CBT.…”