2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of birth simulation for medical students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 10 ] DeStephano et al compared a high-fidelity birth simulator versus low-tech birth simulator on performance and exam scores at the end of the OBGYN clerkship, finding similar performance gains and scores for both forms of simulation. [ 13 ] Our literature review did not reveal any other study reporting post-simulation long-term knowledge or comfort level gains after 6 weeks. Thus, our study with 8-month outcome results supports the utility of OBGYN simulation, particularly proximate to or within the clerkship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 10 ] DeStephano et al compared a high-fidelity birth simulator versus low-tech birth simulator on performance and exam scores at the end of the OBGYN clerkship, finding similar performance gains and scores for both forms of simulation. [ 13 ] Our literature review did not reveal any other study reporting post-simulation long-term knowledge or comfort level gains after 6 weeks. Thus, our study with 8-month outcome results supports the utility of OBGYN simulation, particularly proximate to or within the clerkship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A review of the literature shows that most previous reports were designed by faculty with no GME lead role. [ 10 13 ] Similar to our study, but without the longitudinal approach, Nemer et al created a “Labor Game” by using the resident-as-teacher model with students on OBGYN clerkship rotating through 7 simulated obstetrics stations. Points were awarded at each station, and the student with the highest score won.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un estudio que utilizó dos tipos de simuladores (MammaNatalie® y Noelle®) para la atención del parto vaginal y donde participaron 110 alumnos de medicina, mostró que la simulación previa a la práctica clínica fue considerada "útil" por la mayoría de los estudiantes (52,1% utilizó MammaNatalie® y 61,7% utilizó Noelle®). Luego de los talleres de simulación, el grupo que empleó MammaNatalie® se sintió notablemente más confiado que el que ocupó a Noelle®, en su capacidad de controlar la cabeza y la salida de abdomen y piernas del feto (DeStephano et al, 2015).…”
Section: Confianzaunclassified
“…Un ensayo randomizado controlado que comparó el desempeño de estudiantes de medicina en la atención del parto vaginal utilizando dos simuladores diferentes (Noelle® y MammaNatalie®) reveló que el promedio de partos simulados necesarios por estudiante fue de 1, en ambos grupos, para lograr el desempeño esperado, y que no hubo diferencia significativa entre ambos grupos de intervención, en relación con el puntaje de desempeño asignado por el evaluador. La maniobra que menos requirió de apoyo del profesional fue la salida de la placenta, mientras que la maniobra que más lo requirió fue el control de la cabeza (DeStephano et al, 2015).…”
Section: Simulación Y Partounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation