2014
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of the computerized CBT programme, MoodGYM, for public mental health service users waiting for interventions

Abstract: Due to their high associated dropout rates, self-help cCBT programmes such as MoodGYM should not be provided as front-line treatments. However, as it is likely to be agreeable and beneficial to some service users, perhaps self-help cCBT should be provided as an additional treatment option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
63
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This is noteworthy in light of the small effects of media-delivered CBT as a self-help intervention for the general population (MayoWilson & Montgomery, 2013), especially when offered without therapist support (Cuijpers et al, 2011). Furthermore, the high attrition rates reported for computerised self-help suggest that such interventions might be more useful as an additional therapeutic tool rather than as a standalone intervention (Twomey et al, 2014). Finally, clinicians working in mainstream mental health services are more receptive towards using computers as an adjunct to face-to-face therapy rather than as a standalone intervention (Stallard, Richardson, & Velleman, 2010;Wangberg, Gammon, & Spitznogle, 2007;Whitfield & Williams, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is noteworthy in light of the small effects of media-delivered CBT as a self-help intervention for the general population (MayoWilson & Montgomery, 2013), especially when offered without therapist support (Cuijpers et al, 2011). Furthermore, the high attrition rates reported for computerised self-help suggest that such interventions might be more useful as an additional therapeutic tool rather than as a standalone intervention (Twomey et al, 2014). Finally, clinicians working in mainstream mental health services are more receptive towards using computers as an adjunct to face-to-face therapy rather than as a standalone intervention (Stallard, Richardson, & Velleman, 2010;Wangberg, Gammon, & Spitznogle, 2007;Whitfield & Williams, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an RCT, post-intervention evaluation showed a significantly higher reduction in symptoms among patients who completed the program than among wait-listed controls. 29 A majority of users found this program as acceptable as in-person CBT, stating that they were more likely to continue using MoodGYM over time. 29 …”
Section: Int Cbt-i Coach (Available On Itunes)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…29 A majority of users found this program as acceptable as in-person CBT, stating that they were more likely to continue using MoodGYM over time. 29 …”
Section: Int Cbt-i Coach (Available On Itunes)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the format of support that can be offered alongside computerized/online cCBT can vary widely [e.g. telephone calls, emails, comments on a private forum, one-to-one sessions (45)]. Therefore, future research should be directed towards determining how differing types of practitioner support and differing support formats impact upon the effectiveness of computerized/ online CBT in primary care settings.…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%