2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00258.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin lispro with human soluble insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes on intensified insulin therapy

Abstract: Substitution of insulin lispro for soluble insulin in a multiple injection regimen improved post-prandial glucose control at the expense of an increase in fasting and pre-prandial glucose levels. Patients who already injected shortly before meals expressed no clear preference for the fast-acting analogue, and did not improve their overall control as a result of using it. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia was however, less frequent on insulin lispro, and may emerge as a robust indication for its use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in postprandial blood glucose was also shown in other studies 19,20,23. The same is true for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as part of oral therapy or patients already on insulin therapy 19,2426.…”
Section: Insulin Regular Versus Lisprosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The reduction in postprandial blood glucose was also shown in other studies 19,20,23. The same is true for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as part of oral therapy or patients already on insulin therapy 19,2426.…”
Section: Insulin Regular Versus Lisprosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Rapid absorption of insulin lispro from subcutaneous site allows for a faster peak insulin concentration than is found with regular human insulin. [1617]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If both types of insulin are applied immediately before meals, in a blinded manner, no differences in treatment satisfaction, well-being, or HbA 1c were found (23). These results are supported by the recently published Cochrane Review, which also did not show any clinical benefit of short-acting insulin analogs in comparison with regular insulin in type 2 diabetes subjects (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%