A Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Single-Port-Access Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

Yj, Chen; Ocampo, Elizabeth Joan; Twu, Nae Fang; Yen, Ming Shyen; Chao, Kuan Chong

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.08.266

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

2010

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.08.266

|View full text |Cite

A Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Single-Port-Access Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

Chen Yj

Elizabeth Joan Ocampo

Nae Fang Twu

et al.

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

A Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Single-Port-Access Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

See others like this or search for similar articles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About