2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled study comparing two standardized closure methods of laparoscopic port sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scar in skin wound is obviously less than that with traditional suture. Chen et al (28) demonstrated that incisions closed with tissue adhesive have fewer early complications and a better cosmetic appearance. Amin et al (14) reported higher patient satisfaction levels in MITS with the use of tissue adhesives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scar in skin wound is obviously less than that with traditional suture. Chen et al (28) demonstrated that incisions closed with tissue adhesive have fewer early complications and a better cosmetic appearance. Amin et al (14) reported higher patient satisfaction levels in MITS with the use of tissue adhesives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sutures do, however, have some downfalls in that they require increased time and a skilled individual to accomplish good cosmetic outcomes. Over the past four decades, advances have seen other forms of wound closure methods emerge that address some of the disadvantages of sutures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%