2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01499-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
104
1
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
104
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that our studies (36,37) and that of Janicak et al (39), in which rTMS was used for patients who were not taking antidepressant medication, should stand along with those of Berman's (33) and George's (34) groups described earlier in bolstering the case for rTMS as a stand-alone therapy. One feature that sets these studies and that of Pridmore et al (38) apart is the long treatment course.…”
Section: Ect-controlled Studiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that our studies (36,37) and that of Janicak et al (39), in which rTMS was used for patients who were not taking antidepressant medication, should stand along with those of Berman's (33) and George's (34) groups described earlier in bolstering the case for rTMS as a stand-alone therapy. One feature that sets these studies and that of Pridmore et al (38) apart is the long treatment course.…”
Section: Ect-controlled Studiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…But among nonpsychotic patients, both treatments met with similar success rates, with six (60%) of 10 patients responding to ECT and seven (64%) of 11 responding to rTMS (36). In a follow-up study (37), only patients with nonpsychotic major depression for whom 4 weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy had failed were included. In the ECT group, 60% of patients responded, compared with 55% in the rTMS group (37).…”
Section: Ect-controlled Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grunhaus et al 110 and Janicak et al 112 suggest that the transcranial magnetic stimulation and ECT reach similar results in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. According to the meta-analysis by Martin et al 113 there is no strong evidence of the benefits of using transcranial magnetic stimulation to treat depression, although the small sample sizes do not exclude possible positive effects.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the present review, we have also found five RCT [108][109][110][111][112] and a systematic review about transcranial magnetic stimulation, which have been tested and introduced as a new method of convulsive therapy. Its main principle consists of the rapid alternation of strong magnetic fields.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A later study by the same group used a similar method in 40 patients with severe depression without psychotic features. 17 The initial results were replicated, with an overall efficacy of 58% and no significant difference between treatments. Janicak et al randomized severely depressed patients to rTMS or ECT, with no significant difference in efficacy between the two treatments in 22 patients (rTMS-55%, ECT-64%).…”
Section: Rtms Versus Ectmentioning
confidence: 96%