A randomized control trial: training program of university students as health promoters

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral studies have reported the following as determining factors for the adoption of healthy lifestyles among undergraduate students: gender, socioeconomic level, prior lifestyles, environment, parental lifestyles and health status, career choice, and healthy support networks. However, these factors are influenced by students’ knowledge about healthy lifestyles.Methods/designWe will carry out a randomized trial in a sample of 280 new undergraduate students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico’s Faculty of Higher Studies-Zaragoza (FES-Zaragoza, UNAM). There will be an experimental group (n = 140), comprising 20 students from each of the seven university departments (careers); these students will receive training as university student health promoters through an e-learning course. This course will allow the topics necessary for such promoters to be reviewed. There will be a control group (n = 140), comprising 20 students from each of the seven departments (careers); these students will not undergo the training. Later, the students who comply satisfactorily with the e-learning course will replicate the course to 10 of their classmates. A healthy-lifestyle questionnaire will be given to all the participants, and the parameters established in the self-care card will be recorded before and after the training. The study variables are as follows: (i) independent variable—compliance with the e-learning course; (ii) dependent variables—lifestyles changes prior to the educative intervention (including healthy eating, physical activity, and addiction prevention) and parameters related to health status established in self-care (including weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and hip circumference). Data will be analyzed using Student’s t test and logistic regression analysis odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The analysis of the open answers will be carried out with ATLAS. ti 5.5 software.DiscussionHealth promotion among university students should incorporate options that are feasible for and attractive to students. Thus, as proposed in the present protocol, e-learning courses offer excellent possibilities because they allow students to program their learning in their available time without affecting their academic studies.Trial registrationhttp://ISRCTN77787889

A Gamification-Based Intervention Program that Encourages Physical Activity Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness of College Students: ‘The Matrix rEFvolution Program’

“…Novel approaches to promote PA in an effort to improve CRF in young adults are needed. A potential way of influencing young people to engage in PA daily patterns is through the implementation of healthy lifestyle education programs in university settings [9,10]. In this context, college students are considered as a target population since they are one of the most susceptible age-group in acquiring unhealthy habits due to the university way of life (i.e., long studying times, increment of nightlife, lack of budget, etc.)…”

Measuring the Effectiveness of Healthy Life Style Behaviors Course Given to University Students

“…Ülkemizde ise Dokuz Eylül, Celal Bayar ve Erciyes Üniversitelerinde yapılan araştırmalarda öğrencilerin düzenli beslenme alışkanlığına sahip olmadıkları bulunmuştur 14,15,16 . Araştırmalarda üniversite öğrencilerinde dengeli beslenme alışkanlığının olmadığı vurgulamaktadır 14,15,16,17 . Oysa yeterli ve dengeli beslenme, sağlığı ve okul başarısını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir 18 .…”

COVID-19 vaccine distrust in Colombian university students: Frequency and associated variables

“…Careful consideration should be given to the need for specific public health actions according to university students’ characteristics since health knowledge can have a lasting positive impact on the course of life [15]. Besides, university students adequately instructed in scientific information on the COVID-19 pandemic can be disseminators, promoters, or influencers of vaccination among peers and relatives with less access to truthful information [16].…”