1992
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199208273270903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical and Transabdominal Chorionic-Villus Sampling

Abstract: Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic-villus sampling appear to be equally safe procedures for first-trimester diagnosis of fetal abnormalities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was done under the ultrasound guidance either through trans abdominal or trans cervical route depending on the position of the placenta and choice of operating obstetrician [19]. Adequate sample was obtained through both the routes [20]. The adequacy of sample was confirmed both by visual inspection and under dissecting microscope.…”
Section: Cvs and Fetal Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was done under the ultrasound guidance either through trans abdominal or trans cervical route depending on the position of the placenta and choice of operating obstetrician [19]. Adequate sample was obtained through both the routes [20]. The adequacy of sample was confirmed both by visual inspection and under dissecting microscope.…”
Section: Cvs and Fetal Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, operators must be skilled in both methods. Both techniques appear to be comparably efficient between 8 and 12 weeks, when the overall success rate after two sampling device insertions is considered to be very near to 100% (Philip et al,2004).This efficiency has been confirmed in three national randomized trials of transabdominal vs.transcervical CVS (Brambati et al,1991;Jackson et al,1992;Smidt-Jensen et al,1992). Although the data appear to confirm that the two techniques are equally effective in obtaining adequate amounts of chorionic tissue, transabdominal needling entailed a significantly smaller proportion of repeated device insertions (3.3 vs. 10.3%) and of low weight specimens (3.2 vs. 4.9%).…”
Section: Transcervical Versus Transabdominal Chorionic Villus Samplingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We have not practiced transcervical CVS in a comparable number of patients but several randomized trials show almost identical miscarriage rates after transcervical CVS compared with the transabdominal approach. 5,6 It is important to consider is that there is no increased risks of limb reduction defects following CVS at 10 weeks or greater, but there is an increase in Talipes from early amniocentesis. Hence in the first trimester Chorionic villous Sampling appears to be a safer procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%