2011
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31822cf47d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Comparison Between the Pentax AWS Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Morbidly Obese Patients

Abstract: The time required for tracheal intubation using the Pentax AWS was longer than for the Macintosh laryngoscope and #4 blade. The AWS should not routinely be substituted for a conventional Macintosh #4 blade in morbidly obese patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, intubation time was shorter with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with equivalent laryngeal views . The rate of oral or pharyngeal injury may be higher with the Macintosh laryngoscope than with the Pentax AWS , or it may be similar .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, intubation time was shorter with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with equivalent laryngeal views . The rate of oral or pharyngeal injury may be higher with the Macintosh laryngoscope than with the Pentax AWS , or it may be similar .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Video and optical laryngoscopes Intubation using the Pentax AWSÒ (Pentax Medical Company, Montvale, NJ, USA) has been compared with intubation using a conventional MAC 4 blade, 85 and success was similar. More data are available on the GlidescopeÒ (Verathon Medical Inc., Bothell, WA, USA), including intubation times and success comparable with oral fibreoptic intubation under anesthesia, 86 better views and reduced difficulty with intubation compared with the MAC 4 blade, 87 and success in the awake intubation scenario -although the success rate on first attempt was only 54%, 12% required three attempts, and 4% were failures.…”
Section: Airway Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies comparing the GlideScope video laryngoscope (Verathon, Bothell, WA, USA) and the Pentax AWS (Ambu, Inc., Glen Burnie, MD, USA) to Macintosh DL for intubating morbidly obese subjects failed to support the superiority of VL in this patient population [1, 2]. Additionally, financial constraints, particularly in developing nations, make substitution of the far more costly VL devices for the traditional DL blades impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%