“…Video and optical laryngoscopes Intubation using the Pentax AWSÒ (Pentax Medical Company, Montvale, NJ, USA) has been compared with intubation using a conventional MAC 4 blade, 85 and success was similar. More data are available on the GlidescopeÒ (Verathon Medical Inc., Bothell, WA, USA), including intubation times and success comparable with oral fibreoptic intubation under anesthesia, 86 better views and reduced difficulty with intubation compared with the MAC 4 blade, 87 and success in the awake intubation scenario -although the success rate on first attempt was only 54%, 12% required three attempts, and 4% were failures.…”