1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00944.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized clinical trial of brief interventions in primary health care: summary of a WHO project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
1
19

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
108
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, BI patients are the group that is most comparable with the studies in Bien et al's review. Our effect size of 0.72 for any drinking is larger than those of five studies that found statistical significance when BI was compared to a control group: Babor & Grant [22], Heather et al [23,27,29] and Daniels et al [26]. Finally, effect sizes for the studies for which pre-post changes in control-group outcomes were available, were consistently lower than SAMHSA's effect sizes.…”
Section: Comparisons With Results From Other Sbi Studiescontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, BI patients are the group that is most comparable with the studies in Bien et al's review. Our effect size of 0.72 for any drinking is larger than those of five studies that found statistical significance when BI was compared to a control group: Babor & Grant [22], Heather et al [23,27,29] and Daniels et al [26]. Finally, effect sizes for the studies for which pre-post changes in control-group outcomes were available, were consistently lower than SAMHSA's effect sizes.…”
Section: Comparisons With Results From Other Sbi Studiescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Standardized effect sizes from 14 of the studies reviewed by Bien et al [16] are given in Table 4 [ [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The within-group effects are described by the baseline to follow-up changes in alcohol use among patients receiving BI, and are thus similar in design to the standardized effect sizes from our analysis also given in Table 4.…”
Section: Comparisons With Results From Other Sbi Studiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Studies on this issue (10)(11)(12) showed that nurses are efficient in reducing excessive drinking in primary health care. These professionals have a potential to reduce the prevalence of drinking problems, however, the practices to face the problem are underused (11) and have little effect (10) . A study12 showing the opinions of nurses on drug users, demonstrated that they are predominantly viewed as sick and victims of social conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completion of the AUDIT screening tool without any clinician feedback has itself been shown to be an effective brief intervention and is therefore more beneficial than merely providing women with information on the risks associated with alcohol use and breast cancer. 13 Completion of the AUDIT encourages women to reflect on their drinking level. The NSW Health clinical guidelines for nursing and midwifery practice in NSW support a selfhelp model of intervention when staff lack time to provide a more intensive intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%