2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Manual Versus Mechanical Force Manipulation in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…there is no measurable movement. Further, our subjective experience is that manipulation, purported to mobilise the SIJ [22], really relaxes or alters the compliance of the soft tissues including the ligaments around the hip and SIJ. This experience is supported by interventional MRI studies of spinal mobilisations that do not realign the vertebrae but instead affect the surrounding soft tissues [13].…”
Section: Spinal Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is no measurable movement. Further, our subjective experience is that manipulation, purported to mobilise the SIJ [22], really relaxes or alters the compliance of the soft tissues including the ligaments around the hip and SIJ. This experience is supported by interventional MRI studies of spinal mobilisations that do not realign the vertebrae but instead affect the surrounding soft tissues [13].…”
Section: Spinal Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported various physiological or functional outcomes from SIJ manipulation such as reduction in muscle inhibition (Suter et al, 1999;Suter et al, 2000), electromyographic neuromuscular reflex response (Herzog et al, 1999;Colloca and Keller, 2001), decreased Hoffman reflex (Murphy et al, 1995), improved gait symmetry (Herzog et al, 1991), improved innominate bone tilt (Cibulka et al, 1988), and decreased pain and functional disability (Shearar et al, 2005). However, few clinical studies have evaluated the effectiveness of SIJ manipulation (Osterbauer et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no differences between groups. 66 Stuge et al published the results of an RCT done on 81 subjects with PGP post partum with a positive ASLR and a positive provocation test. They studied two groups: the control group (CG) received "general interventions" that included massage, relaxation, joint mobilization, manipulation, electrical stimulation, hot packs and strengthening exercises.…”
Section: Traditional Interventions For Sijp/sijdmentioning
confidence: 99%