2021
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia

Abstract: Background This was a prospective, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving two parallel groups of patients. Methods Adult patients with symptomatic unilateral primary inguinal hernia were included in this study. Patients were enrolled and treated in five Finnish hospitals. Eligible patients were randomized by use of a computer-based program to receiving either open anterior repair (modified Lichtenstein)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAPP was associated with a lower seroma rate, and TEP was associated with a lower edema rate according to a meta-analysis [37]. There was less early pain and fewer analgesics after TEP repair, compared to Lichtenstein repair with similar infection rates in this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) [38].…”
Section: Complications Of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repairmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…TAPP was associated with a lower seroma rate, and TEP was associated with a lower edema rate according to a meta-analysis [37]. There was less early pain and fewer analgesics after TEP repair, compared to Lichtenstein repair with similar infection rates in this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) [38].…”
Section: Complications Of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repairmentioning
confidence: 79%