2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz158
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised phase II study investigating durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical results and biomarker analysis of GeparNuevo study

Abstract: This study is a joint study of the German Breast Group (GBG) and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Breast (AGO-B). Background: Combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy yielded an increased response rates in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Therefore, we evaluated the addition of durvalumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in primary TNBC. Patients and methods: GeparNuevo is a randomised phase II double-blind placebo-controlled study random… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
439
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 499 publications
(508 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
15
439
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor microenvironment immune activity could affect the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy 11,12 . In the GeparNuevo study, durvalumab (PD‐L1 inhibitor) in addition to anthracycline taxane‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early‐stage TNBC increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate by 9% 5 . Interestingly, we analyzed and found a tendency toward a higher pCR rate in Phenotype A (36/83) than in Phenotype B (16/55), with a marginally significant difference in the combined GEO cohort (Figure S8A, 43.37% vs 29.09%, respectively, P = .09).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tumor microenvironment immune activity could affect the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy 11,12 . In the GeparNuevo study, durvalumab (PD‐L1 inhibitor) in addition to anthracycline taxane‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early‐stage TNBC increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate by 9% 5 . Interestingly, we analyzed and found a tendency toward a higher pCR rate in Phenotype A (36/83) than in Phenotype B (16/55), with a marginally significant difference in the combined GEO cohort (Figure S8A, 43.37% vs 29.09%, respectively, P = .09).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither endocrine therapy nor routine targeted therapy, such as tamoxifen and trastuzumab, is effective in TNBC. However, immunotherapy has been proven to be a promising candidate for TNBC, and more specific biomarkers and classification methods for predicting the applicability of immunotherapy are urgently needed 3‐6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 However, the GeparNuevo trial (NCT02685059), which included earlier-stage T1b and higher disease, demonstrated that the addition of durvalumab to neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin and cyclophosphamide did not significantly improve pCR rates in the overall trial and only improved pCR rates when durvalumab was started 2 weeks before chemotherapy, which was a subgroup analysis underpowered for significance testing. 34 The KEYNOTE-522 trial (NCT03036488) reported that pembrolizumab added to paclitaxel plus carboplatin and then to an anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy, followed by surgery plus an additional 9 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab, improved pCR rates from 51.2% to 64.8%, and 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rates from 85.3% to 91.3% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93). 35 These results need to be confirmed with extended follow-up data and weighed against long-term immune-related toxicity.…”
Section: Early-stage Chemotherapy Combination Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with TNBC were treated with either durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) or placebo, combined with 4 cycles of nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. A higher pathological complete response rate was seen in ICB combination patients, compared with chemotherapy alone (53.4% versus 44.2%) [22]. Despite this trial not having a pre-ICB immune induction arm, it raises the question whether induction with anthracycline chemotherapy before subsequent combination, and/or maintenance during treatment, will be the most effective therapeutic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%