A randomised controlled trial of a group intervention to reduce engulfment and self-stigmatisation in first episode schizophrenia

McCay, Elizabeth; Beanlands, Heather; Zipursky, Robert B.; Roy, Paul; Leszcz, Molyn; Landeen, Janet; Ryan, Kathy; Conrad, Gretchen; Romano, Donna M.; Francis, Daphene; Hunt, Jennifer; Costantini, Lucia; Chan, Eugene Y.

doi:10.5172/jamh.6.3.212

Cited by 44 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As described in McCay et al (2006) and McCay et al (2007), the Healthy Self-Concept model is a 12-week, manualized, group-based intervention specifically focused on individuals who have recently experienced their first psychotic episode. Group meetings are described as lasting 90 minutes, with two professional group facilitators and roughly five group members attending.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

Yanos

Lucksted

Drapalski

et al. 2015

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

270

175

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions. Methods We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma. Results Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy. Conclusions and Implications for Practice We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

Yanos

Lucksted

Drapalski

et al. 2015

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

270

175

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At present, three empirical studies have examined the effectiveness of self-stigma interventions (Luoma, Kohlenberg, Hayes, Bunting, & Rye, 2008;MacInnes & Lewis, 2008;McCay et al, 2007). All of these interventions were delivered in group settings and were comprised of either standard cognitive techniques (e.g., psychoeducation, cognitive reappraisal) or components of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), which includes a focus on psychological acceptance and value-driven behavior (e.g., Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999).…”

Section: Strategies Addressing Self-stigmamentioning

confidence: 99%

Targeting Self-Stigma in Returning Military Personnel and Veterans: A Review of Intervention Strategies

Dickstein

Vogt

Handa

et al. 2010

Military Psychology

119

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There has been comparatively little research examining the effectiveness of intervention strategies designed to reduce or eliminate self-stigma (Dickstein et al, 2010;Mittal et al, 2012). Of 14 published studies to date (Luoma et al, 2008;Link, Struening, et al, 2002;McCay et al, 2007;Shin and Lukens, 2002;Alvidrez et al, 2009;Hammer and Vogel, 2010;Griffiths et al, 2004;MacInnes and Lewis, 2008;Knight, Wykes, and Hayward, 2006;Aho-Mustonen et al, 2011;K. Fung, Tsang, and Cheung, 2011;Lucksted et al, 2011;Wade, Post, et al, 2011;Adler et al, 2009), most utilized cognitive techniques (e.g., psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring) to teach people strategies to better control their thoughts, feelings, sensations, and memories.…”

Section: Intervening With People With Mental Health Concernsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental Health Stigma in the Military

Acosta¹,

Becker²,

Cerully³

et al. 2014

139

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at

show abstract

A randomised controlled trial of a group intervention to reduce engulfment and self-stigmatisation in first episode schizophrenia

Cited by 44 publications

References 37 publications

Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

Targeting Self-Stigma in Returning Military Personnel and Veterans: A Review of Intervention Strategies

Mental Health Stigma in the Military

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About