2020
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2020/45877.14178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomised Clinical Radiological Study using Platelet Rich Fibrin and MTA in Pulpotomy of First Permanent Immature Molars

Abstract: Introduction: Maintaining a vital pulp of immature permanent teeth is an essential and important requirement for dentin formation. Every effort must be made to preserve the vitality of teeth with incomplete apices to maintain the physiological apex generation process as much as possible. Pulpotomy is considered as one of the successful procedures to maintain this process in immature teeth. Aim: To evaluate the treatment success of pulpotomy of first immature molars with irreversible pulpitis using Platelet-Ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gwet's AC1 was equal to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77−0.94, standard error [SE] = 0.04), indicating a very good level of agreement between the two reviewers that performed screening. Thirty records representing 21 different studies (Alawwad et al, 2020 ; Asgary et al, 2017 ; Awawdeh et al, 2018 ; Brizuela et al, 2017 ; Cengiz & Yilmaz, 2016 ; Chailertvanitkul et al, 2014 ; El‐Meligy & Avery, 2006 ; Eppa et al, 2018 ; Keswani et al, 2014 ; Kumar et al, 2016 ; Kundzina et al, 2017 ; Nosrat et al, 2013 ; Ozgur et al, 2017 ; Parinyaprom et al, 2018 ; Peskersoy et al, 2021 ; Qudeimat et al, 2007 ; Suhag et al, 2019 ; Taha & Khazali, 2017 ; Uesrichai et al, 2019 ; Vu et al, 2020 ; Wei et al, 2010 ) were further introduced for data extraction. The remaining 24 records were protocols of potentially eligible studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gwet's AC1 was equal to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77−0.94, standard error [SE] = 0.04), indicating a very good level of agreement between the two reviewers that performed screening. Thirty records representing 21 different studies (Alawwad et al, 2020 ; Asgary et al, 2017 ; Awawdeh et al, 2018 ; Brizuela et al, 2017 ; Cengiz & Yilmaz, 2016 ; Chailertvanitkul et al, 2014 ; El‐Meligy & Avery, 2006 ; Eppa et al, 2018 ; Keswani et al, 2014 ; Kumar et al, 2016 ; Kundzina et al, 2017 ; Nosrat et al, 2013 ; Ozgur et al, 2017 ; Parinyaprom et al, 2018 ; Peskersoy et al, 2021 ; Qudeimat et al, 2007 ; Suhag et al, 2019 ; Taha & Khazali, 2017 ; Uesrichai et al, 2019 ; Vu et al, 2020 ; Wei et al, 2010 ) were further introduced for data extraction. The remaining 24 records were protocols of potentially eligible studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the comparison of BD with MTA was informed by five trials that differed in the duration and treatment performed. The two trials on PRF versus MTA (Alawwad et al, 2020 ; Keswani et al, 2014 ) provided contradictory evidence, and they also differed in the RoB level. The trials on CH versus MTA exhibited the most considerable heterogeneity in the magnitude, direction, and uncertainty of OR and their characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 30 immature permanent molars to study the pulpotomy effectiveness in case of irreversible pulpitis. [16]. Sample size calculation produced a required sample size of 15 immature permanent molars per group to detect a significant difference (90% power, two-sided 5% significance level).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was calculated using G*Power software (PS Power and Sample Size Calculation program, version 3.0.43, https://biostat.app.vumc.org/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize ) based on a previous study [ 16 ]. Sample size calculation produced a required sample size of 15 immature permanent molars per group to detect a significant difference (90% power, two-sided 5% significance level).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%