1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00811439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A radiopharmaceuticals schedule for imaging in paediatrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EANM guidelines started with a report by Piepsz et al, who presented a radiopharmaceutical schedule for an adult-to-pediatric scaling factor that was based on body surface area calculated from patient weight based on the practice at 4 institutions (20). These scaling factors were subsequently studied by Jacobs et al, who investigated whether the factors gave weight-independent effective doses or weight-independent counting rates (21).…”
Section: Eanm Dosage Card (2007 and 2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EANM guidelines started with a report by Piepsz et al, who presented a radiopharmaceutical schedule for an adult-to-pediatric scaling factor that was based on body surface area calculated from patient weight based on the practice at 4 institutions (20). These scaling factors were subsequently studied by Jacobs et al, who investigated whether the factors gave weight-independent effective doses or weight-independent counting rates (21).…”
Section: Eanm Dosage Card (2007 and 2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 3 guidelines adjust the administered activity according to patient weight. Although the use of weight-based activity adjustment has been debated, it has remained a popular approach (2,20,24,25). The North American Consensus Guidelines recommend linear scaling by weight because this results in a small variation in counts per unit area from infancy to adolescence.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Guidelines And A Move Toward Harmonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were administered our standard institutional activities of 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate based on a body surface area nomogram (6). For all patient weights, our institutional activities were greater than the suggested activities based on the NACG and EANM Dosage Card.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urethral catheterization was used selectively. 99m Tc-MAG-3 was used with a minimum dose of 1.0 mCi and the total dose was calculated according to the patient weight (Doses adapted from the report of Pediatric Task Group European Association Nuclear Medicine [7]). Children were imaged in the supine position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%