2016
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A radio jet from the optical and x-ray bright stellar tidal disruption flare ASASSN-14li

Abstract: The tidal disruption of a star by a supermassive black hole leads to a shortlived thermal flare. Despite extensive searches, radio follow-up observations of known thermal stellar tidal disruption flares (TDFs) have not yet produced a conclusive detection. We present a detection of variable radio emission from a thermal TDF, which we interpret as originating from a newly launched jet.The multi-wavelength properties of the source present a natural analogy with accretion state changes of stellar mass black holes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
126
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
7
126
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At a distance of 73 Mpc, this corresponds to a luminosity L ν = (7.7 ± 0.4) × 10 27 erg s −1 Hz −1 . This is slightly lower than the radio luminosity of the nearby thermal TDE ASSASN-14li (likely produced by a non-relativistic outflow; Alexander et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016), an order of magnitude below the radio luminosity of the candidate TDE IGR J12580+0134 (possibly due to an off-axis jet; Irwin et al 2015;Lei et al 2016), and several orders of magnitude below the radio luminosities of relativistic TDEs like Swift J164449.3+573451 (ascribed to an on-axis relativistic jet; Zauderer et al 2011). Additional radio observations of XMMSL1 J0740-85 are planned and the time-evolution of the emission will be discussed in a future paper (Alexander et al, in prep.…”
Section: Radio Observationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…At a distance of 73 Mpc, this corresponds to a luminosity L ν = (7.7 ± 0.4) × 10 27 erg s −1 Hz −1 . This is slightly lower than the radio luminosity of the nearby thermal TDE ASSASN-14li (likely produced by a non-relativistic outflow; Alexander et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016), an order of magnitude below the radio luminosity of the candidate TDE IGR J12580+0134 (possibly due to an off-axis jet; Irwin et al 2015;Lei et al 2016), and several orders of magnitude below the radio luminosities of relativistic TDEs like Swift J164449.3+573451 (ascribed to an on-axis relativistic jet; Zauderer et al 2011). Additional radio observations of XMMSL1 J0740-85 are planned and the time-evolution of the emission will be discussed in a future paper (Alexander et al, in prep.…”
Section: Radio Observationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, ASASSN-14li at z = 0.0206 (D 90 Mpc), discovered in November 2014, has been the best studied TDE to date at all wavelengths, including the optical/UV Cenko et al 2016;Brown et al 2016b), radio (Alexander et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016;Romero-Cañizales et al 2016), X-rays Miller et al 2015), and mid-infrared (Jiang et al 2016), as well as with theoretical modeling (Krolik et al 2016). The archival, nuclear SDSS spectrum of the host galaxy of ASASSN-14li, PGC 043234 (VIII Zw 211; M 3 × 10 9 M ), shows strong Balmer lines in absorption and no strong evidence for current star-formation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only four TDEs with associated radio emission have been published to date: two jetted events discovered by Swift (Sw J1644+57 and Sw J2058+0516), IGR J1258+0134, claimed to have an off-axis relativistic jet (Irwin et al 2015;Lei et al 2016), and ASASSN14li, which produced less luminous radio emission arising from a non-relativistic outflow (Alexander et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016b). Radio upper limits for an additional 15 events rule out Sw J1644+57-like jets in most cases, but cannot rule out slower, non-relativistic outflows as seen in ASASSN-14li (Komossa 2002;Bower et al 2013;van Velzen et al 2013;Chornock et al 2014;Arcavi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radio observations of TDEs also provide an independent measurement of the event energy, the size of the emitting region, and the magnetic field strength (e.g. Zauderer et al 2011;Berger et al 2012;Zauderer et al 2013;Alexander et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016b;Lei et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%