2017
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1283331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A question–answer system for mobile devices in lecture-based instruction: a qualitative analysis of student engagement and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our trial, the formative and summative exam scores of the participants from the PB-ARS group improved marginally compared with those of the control group. This is different from previously reported findings [ 27 , 28 ]. Stowell and Nelson reported a noticeable, but statistically insignificant improvement in student learning curves [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In our trial, the formative and summative exam scores of the participants from the PB-ARS group improved marginally compared with those of the control group. This is different from previously reported findings [ 27 , 28 ]. Stowell and Nelson reported a noticeable, but statistically insignificant improvement in student learning curves [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In our trial, the formative and summative exam scores of the participants from the PB-ARS group improved marginally compared with those of the control group. This is different from previously reported ndings [27,28]. Stowell and Nelson reported a noticeable, but statistically insigni cant improvement in student learning curves [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In this trial, the formative and summative exam scores of the participants from the PB-ARS group improved marginally compared to those from the control group; this is different from previously reported ndings [18,19]. Stowell and Nelson reported a noticeable, but statistically not signi cant, improvement in students learning curves [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%