2017
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1374060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Queer Theorist’s Critique of Online Domestic Violence Advocacy: Critically Responding to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence Web Site

Abstract: Since the foundations of the contemporary anti-violence movement in the 1960s and 1970s, advocates have sought to establish a critical understanding of domestic violence that we can use to direct our efforts for social change. Yet many advocates and advocacy organizations continue to rely on a problematic narrative of sameness that marginalizes and erases diverse victims' experiences and needs. In this article, I conduct a critical discourse analysis of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence Web site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicit in compulsive heterosexuality is that a 'weaker' female body is seen as vulnerable to violence from a 'stronger' male body thereby assuming that gendered violence results in women being vulnerable to violence from men, but not from other women (Ristock, 2011). Consequently, as Sara highlights, the severity and seriousness of violence in LGBT+ relationships is often downplayed, which means that victims often face additional barriers in leaving violent relationships (Shelton, 2017).…”
Section: Lgbt+ Identities and Domestic Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implicit in compulsive heterosexuality is that a 'weaker' female body is seen as vulnerable to violence from a 'stronger' male body thereby assuming that gendered violence results in women being vulnerable to violence from men, but not from other women (Ristock, 2011). Consequently, as Sara highlights, the severity and seriousness of violence in LGBT+ relationships is often downplayed, which means that victims often face additional barriers in leaving violent relationships (Shelton, 2017).…”
Section: Lgbt+ Identities and Domestic Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGBT+ victims may not be aware that their experience constitutes abuse (Shelton, 2017), may be reluctant to seek assistance from domestic violence workers (Bornstein, Fawcett, Sullivan, Senturia, & Shiu-Thornton, 2006), and may even be excluded from receiving adequate, or even any, assistance (Ristock, 2011). The impacts of heteronormativity, as Sara indicated through her own experience at the intersection of domestic violence and organisations, is that only certain heterosexual identities are legitimated as the objects of organisational inclusion and assistance.…”
Section: Lgbt+ Identities and Domestic Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these barriers are likely to be magnified for Rainbow people, as they are for other groups who are not seen as the 'typical ' IPA victim (i.e., men, minority ethnicities;Dixon et al, 2023;Gover et al, 2015;Laskey et al, 2019), due to the heteronormativity that is embedded within societal support services. Many scholars argue that the heteronormativity of IPA interventions explains why Rainbow people are less likely to recognise aggression and unhealthy behaviours in their relationships and thus are less likely to seek help (e.g., Donovan & Hester, 2014;Duke & Davidson, 2009;Guadalupe-Diaz & Jasinski, 2017;Laskey et al, 2019;Morgan et al, 2016;Shelton, 2018;Turell & Herrmann, 2008). People in the Rainbow community who perceive a greater level of heteronormativity in society are, therefore, likely to experience many barriers to seeking help for IPA.…”
Section: Sociostructural Barriers To Help-seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People in the Rainbow community who perceive a greater level of heteronormativity in society are, therefore, likely to experience many barriers to seeking help for IPA. Specifically, people will face barriers of expecting heteronormative conceptualisations of 'victimhood' (i.e., victims are often portrayed as passive and feminine; Baker et al, 2013;Donovan & Hester, 2014;Guadalupe-Diaz & Jasinski, 2017;Shelton, 2018), limited knowledge about Rainbow people in IPA support services (e.g., Guadalupe-Diaz & Jasinski, 2017;Messinger et al, 2021;O'Doherty et al, 2016), and a greater likelihood of experiencing discrimination and stigma from providers (e.g., Guadalupe-Diaz & Jasinski, 2017;Hassouneh & Glass, 2008).…”
Section: Sociostructural Barriers To Help-seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation