2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-010-0379-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quasistatic Evolution Model for the Interaction Between Fracture and Damage

Abstract: To cite this version:Jean-François Babadjian. A quasistatic evolution model for the interaction between fracture and damage. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Springer Verlag, 2011, 200 (3) JEAN-FRANÇ OIS BABADJIANAbstract. This paper is devoted to the investigation of a quasistatic evolution model for a continuum which undergoes damage and possibly fracture. In both cases, the model appears to be ill posed so that it is necessary to introduce a relaxed variational evolution preserving the irrevers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the one hand, this prevents us from considering linear mixtures energies of the form of (1.1) in our frame. In particular, the relaxed models from [14,16,2] seem not directly recoverable in the present setting. From the other hand, this gives us the advantage of tracing the damage variable z into the evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the one hand, this prevents us from considering linear mixtures energies of the form of (1.1) in our frame. In particular, the relaxed models from [14,16,2] seem not directly recoverable in the present setting. From the other hand, this gives us the advantage of tracing the damage variable z into the evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We shall refer to Francfort & Garroni [14], Garroni & Larsen [16], and Babadjian [2] for recent contributions on damage models for brittle materials, namely assuming z ∈ {0, 1}. Besides brittleness, we have to remark that the mechanical stand of the latter papers is quite different from ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations