2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that no priority is satisfied in the waiting process, and, in case of oversaturation, all passengers have the same probability to board the next arriving carrier, provided it is attractive. Under this hypothesis, a possible simple solution would consider the effective frequency [7], namely the line frequency perceived by waiting passengers, which decreases as the probability of not boarding its first arriving carrier increases, or the fail to board probability [10].…”
Section: Background Research On Transit Congestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that no priority is satisfied in the waiting process, and, in case of oversaturation, all passengers have the same probability to board the next arriving carrier, provided it is attractive. Under this hypothesis, a possible simple solution would consider the effective frequency [7], namely the line frequency perceived by waiting passengers, which decreases as the probability of not boarding its first arriving carrier increases, or the fail to board probability [10].…”
Section: Background Research On Transit Congestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of strategy-based assignment, passenger congestion has increasingly received attention in the literature [7][8][9][10] because recurrent queuing and overcrowding have developed into a major problem affecting high-frequency transit systems of large cities. For example, during peak-hours passengers often experience an over-saturation waiting time at stops, because they are not able to board the first vehicle of their choice set that arrives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and their values are shown in Marcotte and Nguyen 1998, Cominetti and Correa 2001, Kurauchi et al 2003, Cepeda et al 2006, Schmöcker et al 2008, Leurent and Benezech 2011. This behavioural assumption implies that no waiting priority is respected and, in case of oversaturation, all passengers waiting at a stop have the same probability to board the next carrier to approach (provided the carrier is attractive).…”
Section: Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%