2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-021-01151-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantum Probabilistic Linguistic Term Framework to Multi-attribute Decision-Making for Battlefield Situation Assessment

Abstract: The decision-making process is always associated with uncertainty and vagueness because of the incomplete decision data and unpredictable decision-making behavior. The concurrence of the epistemic uncertainty and the aleatory uncertainty, especially when only the qualitative data are accessible, poses more challenges to the decision-making. The probabilistic linguistic term set provides a flexible tool for data representation in such an environment. However, most of the existing decisionmaking methods for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the ways that people naturally make decisions, MAGDM techniques are more intuitive. Modeling human behavior with MAGDM is rapidly evolving in various fields [37][38][39][40][41] .…”
Section: Fuzzy Multiple-attribute Group Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the ways that people naturally make decisions, MAGDM techniques are more intuitive. Modeling human behavior with MAGDM is rapidly evolving in various fields [37][38][39][40][41] .…”
Section: Fuzzy Multiple-attribute Group Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4: Calculate the weight of threat factors based on AHP method as Step 5: According to equation (11) to equation (12), calculate the optimal weight of threat factors based on threat factor weight optimization model as…”
Section: Figure 2 Flow Of Dynamic Threat Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research methods have been used in the past to address this problem. For example, Hierarchical analysis method(AHP) [3,4,5] , fuzzy sets theory [6,7] , TOPSIS method [8,9] and multiple attribute decision making [10,11] and so on. However, the above methods do not take into account the effects of changes in air combat situational information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, blackboard model, template matching, Bayesian network D-S evidence theory and other methods is used to solve the problem, but the situation uncertainty and fuzziness are difficult to solve due to incomplete data and difficult to predict confrontation behaviour. Li et al 65 proposed a quantum probabilistic language terminology framework for multi-attribute decision-making, which solves such problems through quantum state, quantum data processing and quantum interaction effect.…”
Section: Situation Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%