A Quantitative Use of the Nidcap® Tool: The Effect of Gender and Race on Very Preterm Neonates’ Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how the check sheet of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) can be quantified and used in research. Using the quantified NIDCAP measures, the hypothesis that Caucasian male infants are less behaviorally competent while in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) was explored. Participants included 42 very preterm NICU infants. Eighty-five NIDCAP behaviors were quantified into scores ranging from 0 to 1, indicating the percentage of time each behavior was observed. Multivariate analyses were used in grouping the 85 NIDCAP behaviors into three subsystems of functioning. The hypothesis that Caucasian male infants were less competent was not supported; neither were gender differences found. Contrary to this hypothesis, African American infants were identified as more vulnerable on several behaviors. NIDCAP assessments were easily quantified. Once the entire NIDCAP exam has been quantified, practice applications may involve automated development of individualized care plans.

Preterm Stress Behaviors, Autonomic Indices, and Maternal Perceptions of Infant Colic

“…Total stress behaviors and self-consoling behaviors were calculated by the total frequency of corresponding behaviors for each domain. 45…”

Preterm infants’ behaviors and skin conductance responses to nurse handling in the NICU

“…Behavioral data were recorded while simultaneously measuring biological parameters (HR, RR, and SCR). Using the behavioral data sheets, the newborn’s behavior was later quantified for stress behaviors of total frequency per domain for each of three subsystems: autonomic behaviors, motor behaviors, and state behaviors 15 . A total behavioral arousal/stress score was computed by adding the three domains as previously described 16 .…”

“Fatal attraction” syndrome: Not a good way to keep your man

“…Del Giudice's characterization of the stress-stricken male as being more aggressive, more dominant, and more competitive may be considered as the early selection of boys to raise the cutoff point of survival, leaving only the highly fit individuals for adult stages when same-sex competition determines the odds for reproduction. This is buttressed by a series of studies in the obstetric literature from this decade, indicating the greater vulnerability of male fetuses as compared to female fetuses (Anderson & Doyle 2008;Deulofeut et al 2007;Ingemarsson 2003;Jones et al 2005;Pressler & Hepworth 2002).…”