A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics?

Edwards, José; Giraud, Yann; Schınckus, Chrıstophe

doi:10.1080/1350178x.2018.1529133

Cited by 19 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As in the more general case of economic research, historians of economics are now also exploring new sources of information and methodologies (e.g., Edwards et al 2018; Düppe and Weintraub 2019). The JDC will, we hope, help develop this new trend.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The History of Economics Journal Database Complement 1969–2009 User Guide

Edwards¹,

Martín²

2019

J Hist Econ Thought

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I. INTRODUCTION Clarivate's web of Science (woS) Core Collection is today the most complete source of bibliometric information for history of economics journals: it includes the journals History of Political Economy (HOPE), the Journal of the History of Economic Thought (JHET), the European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), and History of Economic Ideas (HEI). However, over the whole period of existence of these journals, woS does not contain information for several documents. Therefore, the History of Economics Journal Database Complement 1969-2009 (JDC hereafter), completes the information missing in that collection.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The History of Economics Journal Database Complement 1969–2009 User Guide

Edwards¹,

Martín²

2019

J Hist Econ Thought

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With the rise of digital archives since the mid-1990s, the number of quantitative economic history studies has increased (Edwards et al, 2018). Yet a number of authors have noted the paucity of quantitative accounting history studies (e.g., Carnegie and Napier, 2017), which are also reflected in business history (hypothesis testing being an exception (Nix and Decker, 2021).…”

Section: Quantitative Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation in accounting historiography: Where to from here?

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The world is facing difficult, uncertain and challenging times, which have consequences for accounting practice, education and research. This new and uncertain environment may lead us to conclude that accounting research should focus on the present and develop answers to be implemented in the future. Does this mean that accounting history must be put aside for the moment? We start from the position that accounting history continues to matter and that accounting history researchers have developed their perspectives and methodological and theoretical approaches considerably since the early 1990s in terms of diverse fields and topics of research. This article aims to explore how accounting history research can expand by seeking innovation in theories, sources, methodologies and writing. It demonstrates that accounting history is not static and researchers can contribute to its further recognition and dissemination. Through the innovative study of the past, researchers may continue to contribute to new and informed ways for the world to be managed and governed.

show abstract

“…Few authors defend traditional principles and methods of Economics: they note a noticeable increase in quantitative research among economic historians over the past few years [52]. G. Soldatos and E. Varelas point out the importance of preserving the institutional nature of capitalism as a free enterprise and competitive system under government in the service of the private sector [53].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economics and Political economy textbooks: 28 years of interaction

Privalov

Privalova

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article analyzes the methodology of modern economic theory. The advantages and disadvantages Of the McConnell and brew economies are analyzed. It is compared with the textbook “Political economy” of the period of the USSR and Soviet Russia. A literature review has shown that many authors are critical of Main stream and are looking for alternative theories and methodologies. The article analyzes the institutional reasons for teaching Economics. Given the growing global crisis of industrial civilization and, in particular, the systemic crisis of its economic and political leader-the United States, the question is raised about the need to create a new type of textbook on economic theory. The article describes the philosophical roots of Economics and Marxist political economy. According to the authors of the article, these two areas of science and education in the twentieth century became examples of a “secular form of religion”, since their ideological orientation prevailed over the scientific content. “Russian Economics” is a textbook for undergraduates that has broader system relationships with other Sciences (sociology, political science, Cybernetics, zoopsychology, etc.) and applies, along with well-known models of Economics, also qualitative methods and models of classical political economy within the framework of a systematic approach. The article describes the methodological principles of a new type of textbook that reflect the basic provisions of traditional European culture and can serve to form the concept of the “third way economy”, as an objectively emerging model of a mixed economy.

show abstract

A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics?

Cited by 19 publications

References 43 publications

The History of Economics Journal Database Complement 1969–2009 User Guide

The History of Economics Journal Database Complement 1969–2009 User Guide

Innovation in accounting historiography: Where to from here?

Economics and Political economy textbooks: 28 years of interaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About