1996
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/21.1.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Study of the Enhancing Effect of Nickel Ions on the Taste Response to Sodium Ions of Single Fibers of the Frog Glossopharyngeal Nerve: Competitive Inhibition by Calcium Ions of the Nickel-Enhanced Response to Sodium Ions

Abstract: Single water fibers of the frog glossopharyngeal nerve respond to relatively high concentrations of NaCl ( > 80 mM). NiCl2 at 1 mM enhanced the Na+ response and reduced the threshold concentration for NaCl to 20 mM. CaCl2 at 0.5-1 mM induced an inhibition of the Ni2+ -enhanced response to Na+ ions. A quantitative explanations for these results is provided by the hypothesis that Ni2+ ions secondarily affect a sodium receptor or channel (designated XNa*) that is responsible for the Na+ response and that Ca2+ ion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In mixtures of CaCl 2 and NaCl, Na + inhibited the response to Ca 2+ by competing with Ca 2+ for X Ca , whereas Ca 2+ inhibited the response to Na + by competing with Na + for X Na (Kitada 1991). The antagonism remained in the presence of NiCl 2 (Kitada and Mitoh 1996) or after ANS treatment (Kashiwagura et al 1977). These findings suggest that only the binding of each separate cation (agonist) to its appropriate receptor sites leads to the initiation of impulses in water fibers and that enhancers (presence of Ni 2+ and ANS treatment) can enhance the activation of Figure 3 No influence of exposure of the ANS-treated tongue to 10 mM CaCl 2 solution on the enhanced response to 100 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In mixtures of CaCl 2 and NaCl, Na + inhibited the response to Ca 2+ by competing with Ca 2+ for X Ca , whereas Ca 2+ inhibited the response to Na + by competing with Na + for X Na (Kitada 1991). The antagonism remained in the presence of NiCl 2 (Kitada and Mitoh 1996) or after ANS treatment (Kashiwagura et al 1977). These findings suggest that only the binding of each separate cation (agonist) to its appropriate receptor sites leads to the initiation of impulses in water fibers and that enhancers (presence of Ni 2+ and ANS treatment) can enhance the activation of Figure 3 No influence of exposure of the ANS-treated tongue to 10 mM CaCl 2 solution on the enhanced response to 100 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because the enhanced responses to NaCl (Kitada 1994d;Kitada and Mitoh 1996) and to choline Cl (Kitada 1994b(Kitada , 1994d induced by the presence of NiCl 2 were observed in water fibers, we examined whether 1 mM ANS treatment can induce enhanced responses of water fibers to NaCl and choline Cl. Figure 7 shows the effects of ANS treatment on water fibers responding to CaCl 2 .…”
Section: Enhancement Of Responses Of Single Water Fibers To Nacl and mentioning
confidence: 99%