A quantitative study of letters to the editor by medical students in medical education journals

Abstract

Letters to the Editor offer ways for readers to engage with authors' publications. Letters are the shortest manuscript for medical students to publish and medical-education journals are best suited. The UK Foundation Programme rewards medical students achieving PubMed ID publications and we hypothesise that this is a main motivation for medical students to submit Letters to the Editor. A review of 15 medical-education journals with an impact factor was conducted to identify numbers and percentages of Letters to the Editor by medical students between July 2018 and June 2020. Affiliation of medical students was collected. Our results show over two years, 299 letters were published by medical students equating to 45.9% of total letters. There was a 60% overall increase in letters by medical students published in the first 12 months compared to second 12 months. During this period overall numbers of letters published increased by 27%. 86% of the letters published by medical students over the twoyear period were from UK medical schools. Five schools accounted for 60.5% of these letters. The three medical schools with highest numbers of letters published were King's College London, Imperial College London and University of Oxford for both 2018/19 and 2019/20. The increase in letters published overall with greater numbers published by students, may indicate greater awareness of Letters to the Editor as means of dissemination amongst medical students. UK medical schools published large numbers of letters, perhaps reflecting increasing importance to students of publications due to impacting on subsequent jobs. Results from our quantitative research revealing: large numbers of letters by medical students, increase in letters published from 2018/19 to 2019/20 and overrepresentation of UK medical students supports the hypothesis that medical students are publishing letters to achieve PubMed IDs. Further qualitative research is required to test our hypothesis.

Carta al Editor: Herramienta para la iniciación científica del estudiante de medicina

“…Lo anterior, es propio de las dificultades en el contacto con un mentor experto en aspectos metodológicos y de la construcción del conocimiento propio del estudiante en su crecimiento intelectual. La carta al editor, a su vez, otorga mayor oportunidad de publicar un manuscrito en una revista ubicada en los más altos cuartiles, dependiendo de la calidad de la información incluida (puesto que en algunas ocasiones es permitido hacer análisis estadísticos y gráficos sencillos en esta tipología, lo cual da mayor soporte a lo discutido), y, por tanto, mayor oportunidad de ser citado (11). Entonces, se debe incentivar al estudiante a usar herramientas que contribuyan a su formación científica, a la interacción con la evidencia en medicina y los tópicos de mayor relevancia en disciplinas de interés, y que a su vez puedan ayudar a materializar ideas de investigación.…”

Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics

“…Letters to the editor can be a valuable venue for academic debate (Teixeira da Silva, 2021) but may also be misused. Gasparyan et al (2016) relay, for instance, the case of an author who published hundreds of editorials and pointless letters presumably to boost publication numbers, while Mukhammadaminov et al (2021) found evidence that U.K. medical students have been submitting unusually high numbers of letters to the editor to increase their publications.…”