2016
DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v6n10p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative study exploring undergraduate nursing students’ perception of their critical thinking and clinical decision making ability while using apps at the point of care

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore how a smartphone app influences undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of their critical thinking and clinical decision making ability at the point of care. Using a pretest-posttest approach, the findings suggest that there were no statistically significant differences in the participants' perception of their critical thinking and clinical decision making ability over time. Statistically significant findings on four questionnaire items pertaining to participants' p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Validity of the CDMNS was supported in nursing literature. 16 , 17 The internal consistency of the CDMNS on a sample of nurses was 0.83, 18 and it has since been utilized in over 90 research studies. 19 The Cronbach’s alpha for the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale was .89 in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Validity of the CDMNS was supported in nursing literature. 16 , 17 The internal consistency of the CDMNS on a sample of nurses was 0.83, 18 and it has since been utilized in over 90 research studies. 19 The Cronbach’s alpha for the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale was .89 in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another comparative study, researchers found undergraduate nursing students who used mobile technologies at the point of care were more likely to use strategic and deliberative thinking skills, and rely less on algorithmic thinking than students who did not use mobile technologies. [28] However, there is conflicting evidence pertaining to the impact of using mobile technologies on clinical decision making and reasoning. As well, no studies were found that explored the impact of using mobile technologies over time as students transition into their new graduate role.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%