2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative, real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for beak and feather disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birds with an overall condition score of below three had a mean viral load ratio of greater than 10 3 , while those with a condition score of three and greater had a mean viral load ratio of less than one. Similar results have been reported in a controlled challenge experiment in long-billed corellas, in which a peak viraemia of around 10 6 copies/ll was detected from week two after challenge and continued past week six [31,32]. This is similar to the maximum rep gene copy number found in this study (Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Birds with an overall condition score of below three had a mean viral load ratio of greater than 10 3 , while those with a condition score of three and greater had a mean viral load ratio of less than one. Similar results have been reported in a controlled challenge experiment in long-billed corellas, in which a peak viraemia of around 10 6 copies/ll was detected from week two after challenge and continued past week six [31,32]. This is similar to the maximum rep gene copy number found in this study (Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Quantitative (real-time) PCR techniques are now being more regularly applied to determine individual viral load [ 37 , 53 , 66 ], as probe-based assays are able to detect viral DNA at much lower concentrations than approaches that rely on detection by the naked eye when visualizing a gel. However, the reagents and equipment required for screening using standard PCR are currently substantially less expensive than those used for probe-based assays and are thus likely to have continued widespread use for the purpose of general BFDV screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, serological tests are good indicators of immune status and presence of chronic disease in the bird, but are of little value in predicting a clinical diagnosis of the disease. More recently, molecular based tests [4] , [8] , [15] , [18] that use specific primers for the target sequence, have been more successful in making a timely diagnosis of the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%