2012
DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative psychometric evaluation of an intervention for poor dietary variety in children with a feeding problem of clinical significance

Abstract: Few studies have been published that offer a quantitative evaluation of interventions for feeding problems of clinical significance. Twenty-four children referred to the service for clinically significant feeding problems were administered the Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS; W. Crist & A. Napier-Phillips, 2001) and the Child Feeding Assessment Questionnaire (CFAQ; G. Harris & I.W. Booth, 1992) before and after a duel targeted 16-week therapeutic intervention to improve dietary variety. Di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the included questionnaires show different scores in the expected directions for clinical samples versus normative samples, and the BPFAS, MBQ, and MCH Feeding Scale have undergone factor analysis. Three scales, the BPFAS, the CFAQ, and the CEBI, have also been found to be useful as evaluative questionnaires, demonstrating change in the expected direction after therapeutic input …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the included questionnaires show different scores in the expected directions for clinical samples versus normative samples, and the BPFAS, MBQ, and MCH Feeding Scale have undergone factor analysis. Three scales, the BPFAS, the CFAQ, and the CEBI, have also been found to be useful as evaluative questionnaires, demonstrating change in the expected direction after therapeutic input …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three scales, the BPFAS, the CFAQ, and the CEBI, have also been found to be useful as evaluative questionnaires, demonstrating change in the expected direction after therapeutic input. [58][59][60] The BPFAS is variably correlated with observational assessments of feeding, and reflects caloric intake and some level of dietary variety. It is correlated with some items on the CFAQ, however the CFAQ does not correlate with dietary variety.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the child has sufficiently overcome their sensory sensitivity to the food item(s) offered, then it may be beneficial to move toward a second technique to increase their experience with the item. 30 The current study had some notable limitations that must be considered prior to conclusion. The first factor that limited the application of the findings within the current study is that the sample was homologous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we have already observed a preoccupation among parents to preferentially increase fruit and vegetable consumption following another one of our interventions for children who have a nonorganic determinant of their feeding problem. 30 At this time, it cannot be discounted that some implicit instructions are offered by one or more of the individuals within the center that directed parents to preferentially offer fruit and vegetables. Furthermore, it cannot be refuted that the parents influenced what the children chose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation