2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative PCR based method using propidium monoazide for specific and sensitive detection of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in kimchi cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…qPCR has been widely used as a quantitative test for pathogenic bacteria, including Pectobacterium odoriferum [35], Pectobacterium parmentieri [8], Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum [36], and Pbr [37]. However, the presence of residual DNA from deceased pathogens can potentially restrict the accurate detection of pathogen numbers via qPCR [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…qPCR has been widely used as a quantitative test for pathogenic bacteria, including Pectobacterium odoriferum [35], Pectobacterium parmentieri [8], Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum [36], and Pbr [37]. However, the presence of residual DNA from deceased pathogens can potentially restrict the accurate detection of pathogen numbers via qPCR [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, once the surviving Pbr pathogen remains on the surface of potato tubers, it can also induce soft rot symptoms in newly sown potatoes. Although the traditional plate isolation method can isolate and identify pathogenic bacteria from seeds, it is unable to meet the current requirements for detecting and providing early warnings of bacterial soft rot disease, which is primarily due to interference caused by non-pathogenic bacteria and the time and costs involved in identifying pathogenic bacteria using this method [36,43]. Whether the constructed PMA-qPCR detection system can accurately and effectively detect live disease-causing bacteria under practical application scenarios is a criterion reflecting the necessity of system construction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Petri dishes were incubated at 28°C for 20 h, and the PCC colonies appearing on the plates were counted using the standard plate count method and expressed as CFU/g. Additionally, we quantified the viable PCC cells in cabbage samples by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assays combined with an intercalating propidium monoazide dye [ 23 ]. PCC bacterial DNA was not detected in some cabbage samples, or PCC bacterial DNA was detected in no cabbage samples (data not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each treatment group (F1, F2, P1, and P2), 45 pieces were used for calibration groups (total of 180 samples; F1: 45 samples, F2: 45 samples, P1: 45 samples, and P2: 45 samples) to develop the classi cation models and 15 pieces for the validation group (total of 60 samples; F1: 15 samples, F2: 15 samples, P1: 15 samples, and P2: 15 samples) to verify the tness of the calibration models. For diagnostic analyses of the soft rot disease in cabbage, viable PCC cells were detected using PMA/RT-qPCR assay 25 , water content was determined using the gravimetric method 26 , and extracellular metabolites of the soft rot microorganisms were identi ed using headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) 4 .…”
Section: Napa Cabbage Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%