1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00133469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative model for spontaneous bone metastasis: evidence for a mitogenic effect of bone on Walker 256 cancer cells

Abstract: A new model for the study of spontaneous bone metastasis has been developed which allows for the quantification of metastatic tumor burden and cancer cell growth rate, and which describes the progressive changes in bone morphology. Walker 256 (W256) cells or vehicle were injected into the left upper thigh muscle of male Fischer rats, which were killed 7, 10 or 14 days later. By day 7, metastases had appeared in the distal femur, in the glomeruli of the kidney, and diffusely throughout the liver and lungs. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided clues as to possible mechanisms for tumor cell osteotropism, and shortly thereafter it was reported that bone resorption in bone organ cultures stimulated the proliferation of tumor cells that possessed bone metastasizing properties (301). Consistent with these culture studies, it was subsequently shown in rats that cancer cells immediately adjacent to bone surfaces had significantly greater proliferation rates compared with those that were distant from bone (302). Stimulation of bone resorption was shown to specifically increase the proliferation rate of metastatic cancer cells in bone, but not in other tissues (303).…”
Section: G Rankl and Rankl Inhibition In Bone Metastasis And Multiplsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This provided clues as to possible mechanisms for tumor cell osteotropism, and shortly thereafter it was reported that bone resorption in bone organ cultures stimulated the proliferation of tumor cells that possessed bone metastasizing properties (301). Consistent with these culture studies, it was subsequently shown in rats that cancer cells immediately adjacent to bone surfaces had significantly greater proliferation rates compared with those that were distant from bone (302). Stimulation of bone resorption was shown to specifically increase the proliferation rate of metastatic cancer cells in bone, but not in other tissues (303).…”
Section: G Rankl and Rankl Inhibition In Bone Metastasis And Multiplsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Various techniques of experimental bone metastasis in animals have been developed throughout the years and include injection of tumour cells directly into (1) the intramedullary cavity (Galasko & Bennett 1976), (2) abdominal aorta (Powles et al 1973), (3) tail vein with inferior vena cava occlusion (Shevrin et al 1988), (4) left upper thigh muscle (Kostenuik et al 1992), (5) left thoracic artery with renal artery occlusion and (6) left cardiac ventricle (Arguello et al 1988, Nakai et al 1992.…”
Section: Local Tumour Syndromes In Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined, this leads to increased osteoclast differentiation; resulting bone resorption mobilizes growth factors, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b), insulin-like growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) from the bone matrix. Those cytokines in turn stimulate tumour proliferation and support tumour cell survival [Yin et al 2005;Roodman, 2004;Kostenuik et al 1992;Hauschka et al 1986] (Figure 1). …”
Section: Rank/rankl/opg Pathway In Breast Cancer Bone Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%